Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

LPI Exam 202-450 Topic 11 Question 108 Discussion

Actual exam question for LPI's 202-450 exam
Question #: 108
Topic #: 11
[All 202-450 Questions]

Which of the following statements in the ISC DHCPD configuration is used to specify whether or not an address pool can be used by nodes which have a corresponding host section in the configuration?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Dallas
1 months ago
I'm going with A) identified-nodes. It's the only option that specifically mentions 'nodes' and 'host section', which seems to be the key to this question. Fingers crossed!
upvoted 0 times
Lelia
2 days ago
I'm not sure, but I'll go with B) unconfigured-hosts. It sounds like it could be related to nodes and host sections.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elza
12 days ago
I agree with A) identified-nodes. It seems like the most logical choice based on the question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberlie
14 days ago
I'm leaning towards D) unmatched-hwaddr. It seems like it could be related to nodes with corresponding host sections.
upvoted 0 times
...
Deangelo
17 days ago
I think it's E) unknown-clients. It makes sense that unknown clients wouldn't be able to use the address pool.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Steffanie
1 months ago
B) unconfigured-hosts makes the most sense to me. Why would you want to allow configured hosts to use the address pool? That doesn't seem right.
upvoted 0 times
Latosha
4 days ago
B) unconfigured-hosts could be the most restrictive option to ensure only specific hosts can use the address pool.
upvoted 0 times
...
Giuseppe
8 days ago
E) unknown-clients might be the safest choice to prevent unauthorized access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michael
18 days ago
A) identified-nodes could also be a valid option, depending on the specific network setup.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Junita
2 months ago
I'm not sure about this one. I was leaning towards D) unmatched-hwaddr, but now I'm second-guessing myself. These configuration options can be tricky!
upvoted 0 times
Twanna
13 days ago
I remember reading about this, I'm pretty sure it's D) unmatched-hwaddr.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ezekiel
23 days ago
I'm not sure either, but I think it could be B) unconfigured-hosts.
upvoted 0 times
...
Noel
1 months ago
I believe it's A) identified-nodes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
2 months ago
I think it might be E) unknown-clients.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nada
2 months ago
I think the answer is A) identified-nodes. It sounds like the right option to specify if an address pool can be used by nodes with a corresponding host section.
upvoted 0 times
Jeannine
1 months ago
No, I think it's D) unmatched-hwaddr.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hillary
2 months ago
I believe it's E) unknown-clients.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leonida
2 months ago
I'm not sure, but I think it might be A) identified-nodes, as it sounds like it could be related to specifying nodes with corresponding host sections.
upvoted 0 times
...
Telma
2 months ago
I agree with Dalene, because unknown clients would not have a corresponding host section.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dalene
2 months ago
I think the answer is E) unknown-clients.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77