Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Juniper Exam JN0-649 Topic 3 Question 21 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-649 exam
Question #: 21
Topic #: 3
[All JN0-649 Questions]

You are asked to implement fault tolerant RPs in your multicast network.

Which two solutions would accomplish this behavior? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Bettye
13 days ago
I believe using anycast PIM with statically defined RPs could also be a viable solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Candra
17 days ago
I agree with Floyd. MSDP can help in achieving fault tolerance in multicast networks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maryann
17 days ago
I think B and C are the correct answers. Using MSDP and anycast PIM with statically defined RPs can provide fault tolerance for the multicast network.
upvoted 0 times
Phuong
4 days ago
I agree, using MSDP and anycast PIM with statically defined RPs is a good solution for fault tolerance.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Floyd
19 days ago
I think using MSDP with statically defined RPs would be a good solution.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77