Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

Juniper Exam JN0-480 Topic 1 Question 11 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-480 exam
Question #: 11
Topic #: 1
[All JN0-480 Questions]

A member of your organization made changes to a predefined interface map using Juniper Apstra.

Which two statements are correct in this scenario? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

According to the Juniper documentation1, a routing zone is an L3 domain, the unit of tenancy in multi-tenant networks. You create routing zones for tenants to isolate their IP traffic from one another, thus enabling tenants to re-use IP subnets. In addition to being in its own VRF, each routing zone can be assigned its own DHCP relay server and external system connections. You can create one or more virtual networks within a routing zone, which means a tenant can stretch its L2 applications across multiple racks within its routing zone. For virtual networks with Layer 3 SVI, the SVI is associated with a Virtual Routing and Forwarding (VRF) instance for each routing zone isolating the virtual network SVI from other virtual network SVIs in other routing zones. Therefore, the correct answer is D. A routing zone is used to enable the communication between two VNIs within a VRF. A routing zone is not used for L4-L7 inspection, securing routing protocols, or requiring firewalls. Those are not the purposes of a routing zone in Juniper Apstra software.Reference:Routing Zones


by Sommer at Apr 26, 2024, 11:49 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium JN0-480 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Maile
5 days ago
I'm not sure about B and C. Can someone explain why changes to predefined interface maps won't impact the Apstra software?
upvoted 0 times
...
Nana
5 days ago
I agree with Rikki. Changes in the global catalog won't affect imported interface maps, and anomalies will be raised for changes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rikki
7 days ago
I think the correct statements are A and D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashlyn
7 days ago
I'm not sure about B and C. Can someone explain why changes to predefined interface maps won't impact the software?
upvoted 0 times
...
Bev
8 days ago
Hah, I bet the Apstra developers wish they could just discard any changes we make! But alas, option B is clearly incorrect.
upvoted 0 times
...
Osvaldo
9 days ago
I agree with Latanya. Changes to interface maps in the global catalog do not affect imported maps, and anomalies may be raised.
upvoted 0 times
...
Latanya
10 days ago
I think the correct statements are A and D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marla
11 days ago
I'm not sure about B, but C seems definitely wrong. Changes to the interface maps will impact the Apstra software, whether we like it or not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trinidad
18 days ago
A and D seem like the correct answers here. Changes to the global catalog won't affect existing blueprints, but they could raise anomalies that need to be addressed.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77