Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Juniper Exam JN0-363 Topic 3 Question 49 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-363 exam
Question #: 49
Topic #: 3
[All JN0-363 Questions]

Exhibit

Referring to the exhibit, where should next-hop-self-policy be applied to alter the next-hop value?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B, D

static route with a next-hop of next-table pointing to the appropriate routing table which contains more accurate information rib-groups to mirror routing information from one route-table to another. However, in many cases, in order to make this work, interface-routes also need to be mirrored. RIB Group policy can be used to constrain the routing information instance-import and instance-export statements configured within the individual routing-instances to leak routes from one table to another. Again, policy can be used here to constrain the routing information. This method is more straightforward than the rib-group method A final approach is to use physical interfaces or logical-tunnels to stitch routing-instances and use a routing protocol or static routes across this connection between the two routing-instances.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Melvin
5 days ago
This question is a real head-scratcher! I'm going to go with C just to mix things up a bit. Who knows, maybe I'll get lucky!
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandon
6 days ago
D must be the correct answer. The policy is applied as an import policy, and the group ext-64501 is the one we should be looking at.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberlie
8 days ago
I think the answer is B. The question clearly states that the next-hop-self-policy should be applied as an export policy, and the group ext-64501 is the only one mentioned in the options.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devora
14 days ago
But the exhibit clearly shows it being applied as an export policy for the group int-64503. That's why I chose option A.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gearldine
15 days ago
I disagree, I believe it should be applied as an import policy for the group int-64503.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devora
16 days ago
I think the next-hop-self-policy should be applied as an export policy for the group int-64503.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77