Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Juniper Exam JN0-335 Topic 7 Question 25 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-335 exam
Question #: 25
Topic #: 7
[All JN0-335 Questions]

On an SRX Series firewall, what are two ways that Encrypted Traffic Insights assess the threat of the traffic? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

The service that you would implement at your edge device to prioritize VoIP traffic in this scenario is AppQoS. AppQoS is a feature that enables you to allocate bandwidth and prioritize traffic based on application signatures or custom rules. AppQoS can enhance the quality of service and experience for critical or latency-sensitive applications, such as VoIP. You can configure AppQoS policies to assign different classes of service (CoS) values or queue numbers to different applications or traffic flows. You can also define bandwidth limits, guarantees, or bursts for each class or queue.Reference:= [Application Quality of Service Overview], [Configuring Application Quality of Service]


Contribute your Thoughts:

Natalie
5 days ago
I'm not sure about the answer. Can someone explain why C) It decrypts the data to validate the hash is not one of the ways?
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvia
6 days ago
I agree with Trinidad. I also believe that D) It reviews the timing and frequency of the connections is another way.
upvoted 0 times
...
Trinidad
8 days ago
I think the answer is B) It validates the certificates used.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorean
9 days ago
I'm not sure about B, but I think C is also important. Decrypting the data to validate the hash seems crucial for assessing the threat.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janna
9 days ago
Haha, decrypting the file in a sandbox? That's like trying to catch a ghost with a butterfly net. Gotta go with B and D, those seem like the way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nicolette
10 days ago
I agree with Lashawn. Validating certificates and reviewing timing and frequency of connections make sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kendra
11 days ago
I'm going with B and D as well. Decrypting the file in a sandbox sounds a bit overkill, and validating the hash seems unnecessary for this particular question.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lashawn
13 days ago
I think the answer is B and D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gilma
18 days ago
B and D seem like the most logical options here. Validating the certificates used and reviewing the timing and frequency of the connections would give insight into the potential threat of the encrypted traffic.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77