Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Juniper Exam JN0-335 Topic 4 Question 49 Discussion

Actual exam question for Juniper's JN0-335 exam
Question #: 49
Topic #: 4
[All JN0-335 Questions]

Which two statements are correct about security policy changes when using the policy rematch feature? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Andree
2 days ago
I'm not sure about that. I think it's B and C because changing the address match condition would drop existing sessions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Susana
4 days ago
I agree with Graciela. Changing the action to deny maintains existing sessions, and changing the address match condition reevaluates sessions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Solange
12 days ago
I agree with Shaun on this one. The policy rematch feature is meant to ensure the network is secured, so it makes sense that changes to the policy would impact existing sessions. B and D sound like the logical choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shaun
16 days ago
Hmm, I think B and D are the correct answers here. When you change the policy's source or destination address, it makes sense that all existing sessions would be dropped. And if you change the action from permit to deny, I'd expect the sessions to be reevaluated.
upvoted 0 times
...
Graciela
25 days ago
I think the correct statements are A and D.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77