Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ISTQB Exam ATA Topic 6 Question 63 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's Advanced Test Analyst exam
Question #: 63
Topic #: 6
[All Advanced Test Analyst Questions]

According to the ISTQB Advanced syllabus, which of the following would be the MOST effective method of communication between test team members who are distributed across several time zones?

[K2] 1 credit

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Shala
1 days ago
I disagree, I believe accurate recording of defect information in the defect tracking system is more effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kenny
2 days ago
I think Skype meetings for personal interaction would be the best method.
upvoted 0 times
...
Linsey
24 days ago
That's a solid idea, Joye. I like the mix of synchronous and asynchronous communication. And you know what they say, 'the more time zones, the merrier!' Okay, maybe not, but at least with Skype, we can all enjoy a good old-fashioned case of the time zone blues together.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joye
26 days ago
I'm not convinced the defect tracking system is the best option either. Sure, it keeps everyone informed, but it lacks the personal touch of a real-time meeting. What about a combination of Skype meetings and the defect tracking system? That way, we can have those crucial face-to-face discussions and also keep a comprehensive record of our progress.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
27 days ago
Haha, good one, Micaela! Mandatory meetings across time zones? That's like herding cats, but with a jetlag twist. I think you're on the right track with the defect tracking system. It's a more practical solution that doesn't require everyone to be online at the same time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micaela
28 days ago
I can see the value in both options, but I'm not sure mandatory meetings are the way to go. That could be a logistical nightmare to coordinate. Why not try something more asynchronous, like accurate recording of defect information in the defect tracking system? That way, everyone can stay up-to-date on the project's progress, even if they can't all be in the same virtual room at the same time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Owen
1 months ago
I disagree. Skype meetings can be unreliable and prone to technical issues, especially when team members are scattered across different locations. I think the weekly, mandatory meeting with all personnel present would be the best approach. It ensures everyone is on the same page and can address any issues face-to-face.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dante
1 months ago
Hmm, this is an interesting question. As someone working in a globally distributed team, I can definitely relate to the challenges of communication across time zones. I would say that Skype meetings for personal interaction would be the MOST effective method in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77