Free Preparation Discussions
MENU
ISTQB Exam ISTQB-CTFL Topic 5 Question 21 Discussion
Topic #: 5
Which or the following would be a key difference between a peer review of code and static analysis of code using a tool?
The key difference between a peer review of code and static analysis of code using a tool lies in their approaches and scope. A peer review is a manual inspection of the code by peers or colleagues, focusing not only on the technical aspects of the code but also on other elements such as design, compliance with standards, and maintainability. Peer reviews can identify defects, suggest improvements, and ensure that the code adheres to best practices and team standards.
On the other hand, static analysis is an automated process performed by tools designed to analyze the code without executing it. These tools can detect potential issues such as syntax errors, vulnerabilities, and code smells based on predefined rules and patterns. While static analysis is technically focused, it lacks the broader perspective that human reviewers can provide, such as evaluating the code's maintainability or adherence to project-specific standards. Therefore, static analysis targets the code technically, whereas peer review encompasses a wider range of aspects, making option B the correct answer.
Contribute your Thoughts:
Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77
Cecily
1 years agoKaty
1 years agoFrancisca
12 months agoBenedict
12 months agoCyndy
1 years agoLuther
1 years agoDottie
11 months agoLyda
11 months agoGregoria
12 months agoTy
12 months agoMadonna
12 months agoThaddeus
1 years agoMargurite
1 years agoErin
12 months agoFrankie
1 years agoMagnolia
1 years agoGail
1 years agoEzekiel
1 years agoTonja
1 years agoRhea
1 years agoJamal
1 years ago