Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ISTQB Exam CTAL-TTA Topic 5 Question 32 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's CTAL-TTA exam
Question #: 32
Topic #: 5
[All CTAL-TTA Questions]

An enhancement to a Social Media application allows for the creation of new Groups. Any number of existing application members can be added to a

Group. An attempt to add a non-existing member of the application to a Group will result in an error. Members can also be removed from an existing Group.

Existing Groups can also be deleted but only if there are no current members attached to it.

Which keyword-driven input table provides an adequate test of this enhancement?

A.

B.

C.

D.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

The keyword-driven input table in Option B covers all the necessary scenarios: creating groups, adding members (including handling errors for non-existing members), removing members, and deleting groups only when empty.

This aligns with the functionalities specified in the enhancement description for the social media application.


The ISTQB CTAL-TTA syllabus covers the importance of comprehensive test coverage in keyword-driven testing.

General knowledge on test case design and keyword-driven testing practices.

Contribute your Thoughts:

Lynette
24 days ago
That's a good point, Option D does cover all the functionalities of the enhancement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carisa
25 days ago
I think Option D is the most suitable because it includes test cases for adding and removing members.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
26 days ago
But Option A covers all the necessary scenarios, like adding existing and non-existing members.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lynette
27 days ago
I disagree, I believe Option C would provide a more comprehensive test.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
1 months ago
I think the keyword-driven input table in Option A would be the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
Justine
1 months ago
I'm going with Option C. Gotta test all the edge cases, you know? Can't have any bugs slipping through the cracks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
1 months ago
Ha! Option D looks like a complete mess. 'Add members to a group that doesn't exist' - what kind of test is that? Definitely not the right answer.
upvoted 0 times
...
Allene
1 months ago
Hmm, I don't know. Option B seems the most straightforward to me. Why overcomplicate things, right?
upvoted 0 times
Larue
10 days ago
I think Option B is the way to go too. No need to make it more complicated than it needs to be.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francene
19 days ago
I agree, Option B looks like the best choice. Simple and direct.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Quinn
1 months ago
Option C looks like the most comprehensive test case scenario. It covers adding members, removing members, and deleting groups with different conditions.
upvoted 0 times
Georgene
20 days ago
Let's go with Option C then, it covers all the possible scenarios we need to test.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maddie
24 days ago
I see your point, but I still think Option C is the most comprehensive one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Coletta
26 days ago
I think Option A could also be a good choice, it seems to focus on adding and removing members.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twila
28 days ago
I agree, Option C seems to cover all the necessary test cases.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77