ISTQB Exam ATTA Topic 2 Question 78 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's ATTA exam

Question #: 78
Topic #: 2

[All ATTA Questions]

Part 3 "Bonus Program"

During code reviews, it is the author's responsibility... 1 credit [K2]

Ato address all major and minor defects as stated in the defect log

Bto fix all major and minor defects as stated in the defect log

Cto take action on only improvement suggestions from the defect log

Dto correct source documents that have major defects

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D, E

by Lindsey at Dec 24, 2023, 04:29 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ATTA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Whitley

2 months ago

Ah, the joys of code reviews. Where the author gets to play 'spot the difference' with the defect log. Fun times!

upvoted 0 times

...

Geoffrey

2 months ago

I've got a defect for ya - the person who wrote this question needs to review their own code review policies!

upvoted 0 times

Vallie

8 days ago

D) to correct source documents that have major defects

upvoted 0 times

...

Vallie

10 days ago

C) to take action on only improvement suggestions from the defect log

upvoted 0 times

...

Vallie

12 days ago

B) to fix all major and minor defects as stated in the defect log

upvoted 0 times

...

Vallie

1 months ago

A) to address all major and minor defects as stated in the defect log

upvoted 0 times

...

Walker

2 months ago

D) Correcting source documents with major defects? That's like putting a band-aid on a broken leg. The author should be tackling the code itself, not the paperwork.

upvoted 0 times

...

Naomi

2 months ago

I disagree. I believe the author should only take action on improvement suggestions from the defect log to prioritize tasks.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lang

2 months ago

I agree with Tawny. It's important to address all defects to ensure the code is of high quality.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tawny

2 months ago

I think the author should fix all major and minor defects as stated in the defect log.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tammara

2 months ago

C) Addressing only improvement suggestions? That's a bit too lax, don't you think? As an author, I'd want to fix all the issues, not just the ones I feel like.

upvoted 0 times

Irma

20 days ago

B) to fix all major and minor defects as stated in the defect log

upvoted 0 times

...

Rodrigo

22 days ago

A) to address all major and minor defects as stated in the defect log

upvoted 0 times

...

Melita

24 days ago

B) to fix all major and minor defects as stated in the defect log

upvoted 0 times

...

Raina

30 days ago

A) to address all major and minor defects as stated in the defect log

upvoted 0 times

...

Omega

2 months ago

B) Fixing all defects, major and minor, is the best way to ensure the code is of high quality. Anything less would be unacceptable.

upvoted 0 times

Beula

9 days ago

D) to correct source documents that have major defects

upvoted 0 times

...

Mammie

17 days ago

C) to take action on only improvement suggestions from the defect log

upvoted 0 times

...

Selene

1 months ago

B) Fixing all defects, major and minor, is the best way to ensure the code is of high quality. Anything less would be unacceptable.

upvoted 0 times

...

Paulene

1 months ago

A) to address all major and minor defects as stated in the defect log

upvoted 0 times

...

Horace

2 months ago

I believe the author should also take action on improvement suggestions to continuously improve the code.

upvoted 0 times

...

Mignon

2 months ago

A) seems like the most comprehensive answer, addressing all defects regardless of their severity. That's what I would expect from a responsible author during code reviews.

upvoted 0 times

...

Elin

2 months ago

I agree with Francene. It's important to address all defects to ensure the code is of high quality.

upvoted 0 times

...

Francene

2 months ago

I think the author should fix all major and minor defects as stated in the defect log.

upvoted 0 times

...