Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ISTQB Exam ATM Topic 1 Question 65 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's ATM exam
Question #: 65
Topic #: 1
[All ATM Questions]

Assume you are working on a CAS (Conditional Access System) for Pay-TV that allows the access, selection and transfer of services and media to authorized users. Authorized users can choose their services through different channels: Web Customer Portal, IVR (Interactive Voice Response), Call Centre and SMS. The system uses a Smart Card to receive and decrypt the broadcasted encrypted control words which allow decrypting pay-per-view TV. Every authorized user must have a Smart Card and a Set-Top Box to view the contents.

The following is an excerpt from the product risk analysis document:

Both likelihood and impact have been rated on the following scale: (1 -- Very low, 2 -- Low, 3 --Medium, 4 -- High, 5 -- Very High).

The required test environment and code have been delivered. All test cases for each identified product risk item have been written and are ready to be executed. The Database used to contain the Smart Cards is empty and so only new Smart Cards can be used during test execution.

A Smart Card can only be activated if it has been previously pre-activated. This means the postconditions for the execution of the test cases to test the pre-activation of the Smart Card are the pre-conditions for activation of the Smart Card.

Which of the following statements represents the most effective contribution of the stakeholders to the completion of the failure mode analysis table?

K4 3 credits

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Ozell
21 days ago
I'm with you guys on option B. The expert tester is the one who should be evaluating the detection, not the customer rep. And the pilot? Really? That's like asking a dolphin to assess the risk of a software failure.
upvoted 0 times
Sylvie
8 hours ago
I think option B is the best choice. The expert tester should handle the detection assessment.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alishia
27 days ago
Haha, the aircraft pilot contributing to the priority assessment? That's a good one! I think option B is the way to go. The technical team should be the ones evaluating the priority and detection aspects.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gearldine
1 months ago
This is a tricky one, but I agree with Alba. The stakeholders should be assigned tasks based on their expertise. The pilot and customer rep don't have the technical knowledge to properly assess priority.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alba
1 months ago
The question seems to be testing our understanding of the failure mode analysis process. I think option B is the correct answer, as the system architect and chief software engineer are best equipped to assess the priority of the failure modes, while the expert tester should evaluate the detection.
upvoted 0 times
Thea
1 days ago
Yes, the system architect and chief software engineer should handle the priority assessment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leigha
5 days ago
I agree, option B seems to be the most logical choice.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Salina
2 months ago
I believe option A is the most effective, involving the aircraft pilot, customer representative, chief software engineer, system architect, and expert tester.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dahlia
2 months ago
I agree. It's important to have input from different roles to ensure thorough analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roosevelt
2 months ago
I think the stakeholders should contribute to assess both detection and priority.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77