Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ISTQB Exam ATA Topic 6 Question 37 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's ATA exam
Question #: 37
Topic #: 6
[All ATA Questions]

Ken, an entrepreneur in Leeds finds the quality of the tea locally available so low, that he decides to research superior teas around the world. He decides to market, sell and distribute these superior teas via the web. His market strategy is to offer superior products on a well-designed website with graphics that are fast to load, has high availability, superior usability and fast response times.

The website will offer the following:

-An innovative interactive catalogue of teas, which not only enables customers to buy the product, but also enables them to provide feedback by rating the teas (which will influence his stock purchasing levels)

Provide the customer with the ability to use secure credit card transactions

Provide the customer to give general feedback

Ken selects an iterative model for the development of the prototypes. The team consists of three developers that are experienced in web development. Ken, although he doesn't have technical skillset, is concerned with quality. He doesn't believe a lot of documentation is necessary and he wants the website to be completed quickly.

The test basis contains the following:

-Story boards that show the information flow and page links through the site

-HTML pages developed to date.

-A statement of non-functional requirements.

With the strategy taking shape, Ken asks your advice on the specific testing techniques that should be used to complete the required testing, bearing in mind the nature of the application and the nature of Ken's overall objectives.

Which of the following represents the best choice of testing techniques in this scenario?

[K4] 3 credits

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Helga
26 days ago
Hmm, I'm sensing a bit of a control freak in Ken. 'Doesn't believe a lot of documentation is necessary'? Yikes. Still, A is the right choice. Gotta cover those bases, Ken!
upvoted 0 times
Valentin
5 days ago
Hmm, I agree. Ken seems to be very focused on quality and efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalie
10 days ago
A) Equivalence partitioning and boundary value analysis using the storyboard ideas as a basis to maximize functional coverage.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Evette
28 days ago
Wow, Ken really wants to get this done quickly, huh? Well, good luck with that, buddy. I'm with Afton on this one - A is the way to go. Gotta love those storyboards!
upvoted 0 times
...
Lenora
1 months ago
State transition testing? What is this, a space shuttle launch? A is the clear winner here. Keep it simple, keep it effective.
upvoted 0 times
Bernadine
1 days ago
State transition testing? What is this, a space shuttle launch?
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
12 days ago
A) Equivalence partitioning and boundary value analysis using the storyboard ideas as a basis to maximize functional coverage.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ashlee
1 months ago
Decision testing? Nah, that's more for complex logic. This is a e-commerce website, so A all the way. Gotta cover those edge cases, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Dean
1 months ago
C definitely sounds tempting, but with Ken's focus on quality, I think A is the way to go. Gotta make sure the core functionality is solid.
upvoted 0 times
Vi
6 days ago
A sounds like the most logical option to ensure the website works smoothly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ettie
11 days ago
I think A is a good choice too, we need to maximize functional coverage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuonne
25 days ago
I agree, A seems like the best choice to ensure the core functionality is solid.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Afton
2 months ago
Hmm, I'd go with option A. Equivalence partitioning and boundary value analysis seem like the best approach to thoroughly test the website's functionality, especially with those storyboards as a guide.
upvoted 0 times
Rory
25 days ago
Yeah, using the storyboards as a basis for equivalence partitioning and boundary value analysis makes sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
29 days ago
I agree, option A sounds like a solid choice for testing the website.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mari
2 months ago
I personally think option C) is the way to go, as it leverages the team's experience to maximize the effectiveness of testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamra
2 months ago
I agree with Tiffiny, option A) seems like the most logical choice to ensure thorough testing of the website.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tiffiny
2 months ago
I think option A) is the best choice because it covers a wide range of scenarios based on the storyboard ideas.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77