Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ISTQB Exam ATA Topic 5 Question 87 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's ATA exam
Question #: 87
Topic #: 5
[All ATA Questions]

As a test analyst you are gathering data to support accurate metrics. Which of the following metrics would be MOST appropriate to use to monitor product quality?

[K2] 1 credit

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Jettie
5 days ago
Compliance to entry criteria? What is this, a beauty pageant? I'll take 'tests run and tests passed' any day.
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
8 days ago
But don't you think monitoring defects found versus expected gives a better indication of the product's quality?
upvoted 0 times
...
Glendora
10 days ago
Well, if I was a defect, I'd much rather be 'expected' than 'found'! Option A for me.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jannette
11 days ago
I was leaning towards E, since product risks are a key indicator of quality. But I suppose that's more focused on risk management than pure quality metrics.
upvoted 0 times
...
Odette
13 days ago
Option B looks the most straightforward to me. Tracking tests run and tests passed seems like a clear way to monitor product quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Izetta
13 days ago
I disagree, I believe E) Product risks outstanding and new risks introduced is more important for monitoring product quality.
upvoted 0 times
...
Skye
25 days ago
I think A) Defects found versus defects expected would be the most appropriate metric.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77