Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

ISTQB Exam ATA Topic 5 Question 39 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISTQB's ATA exam
Question #: 39
Topic #: 5
[All ATA Questions]

Analyzing the requirement, ''The system shall allow cash advances of at least 200 Euros for all supported credit cards. The correct list of credit cards is American Express, Diners, VISA, Mastercard and Eurocard.'' There are arguments to be made for several test design techniques.

Which of the following test design techniques is LEAST likely to be used for identifying test cases for the requirement?

[K4] 3 credits

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

by Latrice at Oct 25, 2022, 11:17 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium ATA Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Amber
2 months ago
Wait, they're asking us to identify the *least* likely technique? I guess they want us to think outside the box... or maybe just outside the cash advance limit.
upvoted 0 times
Kimbery
19 hours ago
A) Boundary value analysis
upvoted 0 times
...
Josue
11 days ago
D) State Transition Testing
upvoted 0 times
...
Brice
12 days ago
C) Classification Tree Method
upvoted 0 times
...
Jules
28 days ago
B) Equivalence Partitioning
upvoted 0 times
...
Kayleigh
30 days ago
A) Boundary value analysis
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Avery
2 months ago
Equivalence Partitioning sounds like the way to go. Just need to identify the different credit card types and test a representative sample.
upvoted 0 times
...
Filiberto
2 months ago
I believe Boundary value analysis is also not suitable for this scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tonette
2 months ago
I'm going with Classification Tree Method. This requirement feels more like a simple input-output scenario, not something that would warrant a complex classification tree.
upvoted 0 times
Barbra
14 days ago
I think State Transition Testing is the least likely to be used here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Devon
16 days ago
I agree, Classification Tree Method seems like overkill for this requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
17 days ago
D) State Transition Testing
upvoted 0 times
...
Karma
18 days ago
C) Classification Tree Method
upvoted 0 times
...
Orville
24 days ago
B) Equivalence Partitioning
upvoted 0 times
...
Elenore
1 months ago
A) Boundary value analysis
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Glory
2 months ago
Hmm, I'd say State Transition Testing is the least likely. There doesn't seem to be any state changes involved in this requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vicente
2 months ago
I agree with Stephen. State Transition Testing doesn't seem relevant for this requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roxane
2 months ago
I think Boundary Value Analysis is the least likely to be used here. The requirement doesn't really have any clear boundaries to test.
upvoted 0 times
Laurel
8 days ago
Percy: Yeah, it seems like a better fit for identifying test cases for this requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chan
9 days ago
User 3: I agree with Chan, Equivalence Partitioning makes more sense here.
upvoted 0 times
...
Percy
1 months ago
User 2: I think Equivalence Partitioning would be more useful in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
Val
1 months ago
User 1: I agree, Boundary Value Analysis doesn't seem relevant for this requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Stephen
2 months ago
I think the least likely test design technique is State Transition Testing.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77