Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

iSQI Exam CTFL-PT_D Topic 3 Question 7 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTFL-PT_D exam
Question #: 7
Topic #: 3
[All CTFL-PT_D Questions]

(REFER TO BASE SCENARIO 2): When you refer to Base Scenario 2. you are referring to the description and only the description, without any modification.

Question specific constraints: (specific constraints are not part of the Base Scenario and are specific to this question).

Natalie has run a performance test cycle. The following metrics have been collected:

Total virtual users: 10,000.

* Status of the simulated users.

o Total number of users for whom all transactions have been completed: 89%.

* Transaction response time, o Check-in

Response time < 1 second: 60%

Response time < 2 seconds: 70%

Response time < 3 seconds: 88%

Response time < 5 seconds: 90%

Response time < 10 seconds: 95%

Question

Given this information, how should Natalie present the results to those involved?

SELECT ONE OPTION

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

The correct associations between the aspects and factors to be considered when selecting performance testing tools are:

1. Compatibility: Protocols. (C)

2. Scalability: Ability to generate load from multiple points of presence. (D)

3. Understandability: Level of technical knowledge needed to use the tool. (A)

4. Monitoring: Correlation of the monitoring with the defined transactions. (B)


* ISTQB Performance Testing Syllabus

* ISTQB Glossary

Contribute your Thoughts:

Freeman
1 months ago
Whoa, 10,000 virtual users? Natalie's got some serious simulation skills. With those kind of numbers, I bet she can test the system to its breaking point and beyond!
upvoted 0 times
Valene
3 days ago
Jess: I wonder how she will present the results to everyone involved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jess
10 days ago
User 2: Yeah, that's a huge number for a performance test.
upvoted 0 times
...
Verlene
14 days ago
User 1: Natalie must be really skilled to handle 10,000 virtual users.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Nell
1 months ago
Alright, time to put on our improvement hats! The transactions are 'below the acceptance value' - that's the language of opportunity, my friends. Let's make this system sing!
upvoted 0 times
Helaine
12 days ago
D) The percentage of completed transactions is close to the acceptance value, an improvement is required. The transactions associated with the check in are below the acceptance value, an improvement is required.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paz
16 days ago
B) The percentage of completed transactions is close to the acceptance value, an improvement is required. The transactions associated with the check-in are close to the acceptance value, no Improvement is required.
upvoted 0 times
...
Albina
19 days ago
A) The percentage of completed transactions is so close to the acceptance value that no improvement is required. The transactions associated with the check-in are below the acceptance value, a minimum improvement is required.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Han
2 months ago
89% on the completed transactions? That's a solid effort, but we can do better. And those check-in times need some attention too. Time to optimize and impress the stakeholders!
upvoted 0 times
Arlene
15 days ago
D) The percentage of completed transactions is close to the acceptance value, an improvement is required. The transactions associated with the check-in are below the acceptance value, an improvement is required.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamie
18 days ago
89% completion is good, but we need to focus on improving check-in times.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rachael
1 months ago
A) The percentage of completed transactions is so close to the acceptance value that no improvement is required. The transactions associated with the check-in are below the acceptance value, a minimum improvement is required.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Shalon
2 months ago
Hmm, looks like we've got some work to do. The completed transactions are 'close to the acceptance value' - that's a polite way of saying 'not quite there yet'. Let's roll up our sleeves and get to it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
2 months ago
I believe option D is the best choice based on the metrics provided.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mabelle
2 months ago
The results look promising, but we can't be complacent. That 90% on the check-in is a bit too close for comfort. Time to put on our problem-solving hats!
upvoted 0 times
Launa
1 months ago
The results are good overall, but we definitely need to focus on improving the check-in transaction response time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francesco
1 months ago
A) The percentage of completed transactions is so close to the acceptance value that no improvement is required. The transactions associated with the check-in are below the acceptance value, a minimum improvement is required.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Glenn
2 months ago
I agree with Isaac. The check-in transactions need improvement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isaac
2 months ago
I think Natalie should choose option D.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77