Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

iSQI Exam CTFL-AuT Topic 4 Question 55 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTFL-AuT exam
Question #: 55
Topic #: 4
[All CTFL-AuT Questions]

Your company produces electric windows and corresponding control units. The newest control unit for electric windows has repeatedly been problematic, which you think result from issues In the requirements, in particular, you noticed Bee following requirements in your first review.

Which of the following requirements for the system test violates at least one of the quality criteria of the ISO/IEC/IEEE 29148:2011 ?

ID; 12. When the central lock is activated, then all windows are automatically closed.

ID; 37 Given: the ignition q activated. When the button tor a window is pressed down, then the window moves down.

ID; 85: Given: the window moves up. When the window encounters resistance, then the window ttng motor stops.

ID; 142; Given: a door is open When the button for a window is pressed then the message M-85 is sent to the control unit

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer

Contribute your Thoughts:

Julie
1 months ago
Looks like the developers were having a bit too much fun with their requirements. 'M-85' - is that some kind of secret code for 'windows not working'?
upvoted 0 times
...
Crista
1 months ago
Requirement 142 is not verifiable on the system level. How do you test a 'message M-85' being sent to the control unit? That's a bit vague.
upvoted 0 times
Tanesha
2 days ago
A) The requirement 85 is not atomic
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilbert
9 days ago
C) The requirement 12 is ambiguous.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alpha
12 days ago
B) The requirement 37 is inconsistent on system level.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nieves
14 days ago
A) The requirement 85 is not atomic
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Estrella
2 months ago
Requirement 12 is definitely ambiguous. It doesn't specify what 'central lock' means or how it's related to the windows.
upvoted 0 times
Franchesca
8 days ago
C) The requirement 12 is ambiguous.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruthann
1 months ago
B) The requirement 37 is Inconsistent on system level.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronnie
2 months ago
A) The requirement 85 is not atomic
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Otis
2 months ago
I agree, requirement 37 is a bit inconsistent. It doesn't specify what should happen if the ignition is not activated.
upvoted 0 times
Dalene
1 months ago
User 2: I think so too. It needs to be more clear.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maynard
1 months ago
User 1: Requirement 37 is definitely inconsistent.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gearldine
2 months ago
Requirement 85 seems to be the issue here. It's not atomic, as it's got multiple conditions packed into a single requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nydia
2 months ago
I believe requirement 37 is also inconsistent on a system level.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brittani
2 months ago
I agree, it's not atomic and could lead to issues.
upvoted 0 times
...
King
3 months ago
I think requirement 85 violates the quality criteria.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77