D is definitely the way to go. Agile's focus on responding to change means the codebase is in a constant state of flux, making regression a major concern.
D is definitely the way to go. Agile's focus on responding to change means the codebase is in a constant state of flux, making regression a major concern.
I think B is the correct answer. AuBrigetteated tests can sometimes introduce new issues or fail to catch regressions, increasing the risk of software regression.
Option D seems like the most reasonable answer. The constant change in business needs during sprints can lead to significant code churn, making regression a high risk in agile projects.
I believe regression is built into software as a safeguard against unexpected failures, but it can still be a high risk in agile projects due to the constant changes.
Gabriele
1 months agoRosendo
10 days agoPilar
1 months agoElvera
13 days agoBonita
19 days agoIsabella
30 days agoBarbra
2 months agoMalcom
15 days agoRaina
23 days agoBarney
1 months agoBrigette
2 months agoLorean
2 months agoKeshia
14 days agoLezlie
23 days agoElliott
29 days agoShalon
2 months agoGianna
2 months agoHorace
3 months agoMargery
3 months ago