Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

iSQI Exam CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Topic 3 Question 48 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTAL-TM_Syll2012 exam
Question #: 48
Topic #: 3
[All CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Questions]

You are working on a project to develop an authentication system for an e-commerce website. This system provides two features: Registration and authentication. Two different development teams develop these two features.

There is a high likelihood that the delivery of the authentication feature to the test team will be three weeks later. To complete the registration the user must provide the following registration inputs: Name, surname, birth date, fiscal code and he/she can select a username and a password. A registered user can be a special user or a normal user. To be identified as a special user, he/she must also provide, during the registration process, a voucher possibly received from the IT department.

Access is granted only if a user is registered and the password is correct: In all other cases access is denied. If the registered user is a special user and the password is wrong, a special warning is shown on the system console. You are currently performing a quality risk analysis using FMEA .

Based only on the given information, which of the following is NOT a product risk that could be identified during the quality risk analysis? K4 3 credits

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Deonna
2 months ago
Option B is the one that really catches my eye. Not displaying a proper warning for a special user is a missed opportunity to provide valuable feedback.
upvoted 0 times
Nan
9 days ago
Definitely, a missed warning could cause security concerns and user frustration.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nan
25 days ago
Yes, providing clear feedback to users, especially special users, is crucial for a smooth user experience.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fletcher
25 days ago
It's important for the system to provide clear feedback to users, especially special users.
upvoted 0 times
...
Casie
26 days ago
It's definitely a risk that should be addressed during the quality risk analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sherrell
1 months ago
I agree, not showing a warning for a special user with a wrong password can lead to confusion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mignon
1 months ago
I agree, not displaying a special warning for a special user with a wrong password could lead to confusion.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Kanisha
2 months ago
Ha! Imagine a special user getting a 'special warning' on the console for a wrong password. That's like having a fancy dinner bell to announce you've burned the roast.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elfriede
2 months ago
The late delivery of the authentication feature could definitely cause delays in testing, so option A is a valid concern. I hope the teams can work together to ensure a smooth rollout.
upvoted 0 times
Vinnie
19 days ago
C) The late delivery of the authentication feature could definitely cause delays in testing, so option A is a valid concern. I hope the teams can work together to ensure a smooth rollout.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherrie
24 days ago
B) The authentication system denies access for a special user with a wrong password, but doesn't display a special warning on the system console
upvoted 0 times
...
Eun
1 months ago
A) The late delivery of the authentication feature to the test team causes delays in the start of test execution and this could result in a shorter test period
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pearlie
2 months ago
I'm surprised option C is even a possibility. Allowing normal users to access the system with the wrong password is a major oversight and a huge security vulnerability.
upvoted 0 times
Evangelina
28 days ago
User 2: I agree, it's important to ensure only authorized users have access.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nakita
1 months ago
User 1: Option C is definitely a big security risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carisa
2 months ago
User 2: I agree, that's a major flaw in the authentication system. It should only grant access to registered users with the correct password.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlesetta
2 months ago
User 1: Option C is definitely a big security risk. Allowing normal users in with the wrong password is a no-go.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tawna
2 months ago
Hmm, option D seems like the obvious risk here. Granting access to a special user with a wrong password is a serious security flaw that needs to be addressed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laurel
2 months ago
I see your point. So, we should focus on options A, C, and D as potential product risks during the quality risk analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leota
2 months ago
I agree with Buffy. Option B seems more like a usability issue rather than a product risk.
upvoted 0 times
...
Buffy
3 months ago
I think option B is NOT a product risk because it doesn't affect the functionality of the system.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77