Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

iSQI Exam CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Topic 2 Question 76 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTAL-TM_Syll2012 exam
Question #: 76
Topic #: 2
[All CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Questions]

You can count on well-written requirements, but you can't count on an adequate contribution of the stakeholders to the quality risk analysis. You have to mitigate the insufficient contribution of the stakeholders because the risk-based testing approach shall minimize the product risks. Your test team has one expert tester in security testing. Which of the following test activities would you expect to be the less important in this context? K4 3 credits

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Blondell
1 months ago
Option A? More like 'Extract from the dusty archives of the previous project's defects and pray they're still relevant.'
upvoted 0 times
Kimbery
5 days ago
C) Apply systematic and exploratory testing for integration and system test
upvoted 0 times
...
Nida
24 days ago
B) Automate all functional and non-functional system tests
upvoted 0 times
...
Eric
1 months ago
A) Extract from the defect tracking system of the previous project all the security defects and failures, and classify them to support design and execution of specific tests
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Derrick
2 months ago
D is the way to go. Exploratory testing with security-focused charters is key when you can't rely on stakeholder input.
upvoted 0 times
Ceola
8 days ago
That's a good point. Automation can definitely help in ensuring thorough testing alongside exploratory testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lawana
23 days ago
I think we should also consider automating all functional and non-functional system tests to ensure comprehensive coverage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willodean
1 months ago
Agreed, exploratory testing with security-focused charters is crucial for thorough testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlette
2 months ago
D is definitely important in this case. We need to cover all security aspects.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ernestine
2 months ago
Haha, option C is a joke, right? 'Systematic and exploratory' testing? That's like saying 'organized chaos'.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willodean
2 months ago
I'd have to go with B. Automating all functional and non-functional tests is the best way to ensure consistent, comprehensive testing coverage.
upvoted 0 times
Malissa
28 days ago
B) Automate all functional and non-functional system tests
upvoted 0 times
...
Katina
1 months ago
A) Extract from the defect tracking system of the previous project all the security defects and failures, and classify them to support design and execution of specific tests
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vashti
2 months ago
But don't you think automating tests can help in ensuring security aspects are covered efficiently?
upvoted 0 times
...
Salena
2 months ago
Option A seems like the most obvious choice here. Digging into past security defects is crucial to designing effective security tests for this project.
upvoted 0 times
Mignon
25 days ago
D) Perform exploratory testing sessions with adequate charters covering security aspects
upvoted 0 times
...
Gertude
1 months ago
C) Apply systematic and exploratory testing for integration and system test
upvoted 0 times
...
Rory
1 months ago
B) Automate all functional and non-functional system tests
upvoted 0 times
...
Floyd
2 months ago
A) Extract from the defect tracking system of the previous project all the security defects and failures, and classify them to support design and execution of specific tests
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Linette
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C) Apply systematic and exploratory testing for integration and system test would be less important.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vashti
2 months ago
I think option B) Automate all functional and non-functional system tests would be the less important in this context.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77