Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

iSQI Exam CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Topic 2 Question 64 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTAL-TM_Syll2012 exam
Question #: 64
Topic #: 2
[All CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Questions]

You are the Test Manager of a project that adopts a V-model with four formal levels of testing.

unit, integration, system and acceptance testing.

On this project reviews have been conducted for each development phase prior to testing, which is to say that reviews of requirements, functional specification, high-level design, low-level design and code have been performed prior to testing.

Assume that no requirements defects have been reported after the release of the product. Which TWO of the following metrics do you need in order to evaluate the requirements reviews in terms of phase containment effectiveness?

K3 2 credits

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C, E

Contribute your Thoughts:

Rodolfo
2 months ago
I'm with the others on this one. B and E are the metrics you need. Though I kind of wish the question had asked for the number of coffee cups consumed during the requirements review. That would be a more useful metric, don't you think?
upvoted 0 times
Walker
18 days ago
E) Total number of defects attributable to requirements, found during functional specification review, high-level design review, low-level design review, code review, unit testing, integration testing, system testing and acceptance testing
upvoted 0 times
...
Temeka
1 months ago
B) Total number of defects attributable to requirements found during unit, integration, system and acceptance testing
upvoted 0 times
...
Joye
1 months ago
A) Number of defects found during the requirements review
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Huey
2 months ago
Haha, I guess the developers must have aced the requirements review if no defects were found after release. Maybe they just wrote really vague requirements to begin with!
upvoted 0 times
Tish
8 days ago
B) Total number of defects attributable to requirements found during unit, integration, system and acceptance testing
upvoted 0 times
...
Judy
24 days ago
A) Number of defects found during the requirements review
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Erinn
2 months ago
I also think C could be useful to see the total number of defects found across all reviews and testing phases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tori
2 months ago
I agree with Phillip. A will show us the defects found during the requirements review, and B will give us the total number of defects attributable to requirements found during testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aron
2 months ago
I agree with Carisa. Option B and E are the way to go. Tracking the requirements-related defects through the different testing phases is crucial.
upvoted 0 times
Laura
1 months ago
I agree, Option E is also crucial as it includes all the defects found in different reviews and testing phases related to requirements.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rima
2 months ago
I think Option B is important because it tracks all the defects related to requirements found during testing phases.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Phillip
2 months ago
I think we need to consider both A and B to evaluate the requirements reviews.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carisa
2 months ago
The correct answers are B and E. These metrics will help evaluate the effectiveness of the requirements review in terms of phase containment. Knowing the total number of defects attributable to requirements is key.
upvoted 0 times
Alesia
1 months ago
Yes, understanding the phase containment effectiveness is crucial for improving our processes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vincenza
2 months ago
It's important to track the total number of defects related to requirements found during testing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gerald
2 months ago
Agreed, those metrics will help us assess the effectiveness of the review process.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kimberlie
2 months ago
I think the key metrics for evaluating requirements reviews are B and E.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77