Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

iSQI Exam CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Topic 2 Question 38 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTAL-TM_Syll2012 exam
Question #: 38
Topic #: 2
[All CTAL-TM_Syll2012 Questions]

Assume you are working on a CAS (Conditional Access System) for Pay-TV that allows the access, selection and transfer of services and media to authorized users. Authorized users can choose their services through different channels: Web Customer Portal, IVR (Interactive Voice Response), Call Centre and SMS. The system uses a Smart Card to receive and decrypt the broadcasted encrypted control words which allow decrypting pay-per-view TV. Every authorized user must have a Smart Card and a Set-Top Box to view the contents.

The following is an excerpt from the product risk analysis document:

Both likelihood and impact have been rated on the following scale: (1 -- Very low, 2 -- Low, 3 --Medium, 4 -- High, 5 -- Very High).

The required test environment and code have been delivered. All test cases for each identified product risk item have been written and are ready to be executed. The Database used to contain the Smart Cards is empty and so only new Smart Cards can be used during test execution.

A Smart Card can only be activated if it has been previously pre-activated. This means the postconditions for the execution of the test cases to test the pre-activation of the Smart Card are the pre-conditions for activation of the Smart Card.

Which of the following statements represents the most effective contribution of the stakeholders to the completion of the failure mode analysis table?

K4 3 credits

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Alberto
1 months ago
Okay, let's focus here. The question is asking about the most effective contribution of stakeholders to the failure mode analysis. Based on the information provided, I think the system architect, chief software engineer, and expert tester would be the best ones to assess the priority, while the customer representative would be best suited to assess the detection.
upvoted 0 times
Elbert
1 days ago
B) The aircraft pilot and the customer representative should contribute to assess the priority. The chief software engineer, the system architect and the expert tester should contribute to assess the detection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maurine
3 days ago
A) The aircraft pilot and the customer representative should contribute to assess the detection. The chief software engineer, the system architect and the expert tester should contribute to assess the priority.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fernanda
11 days ago
C) The system architect and the chief software engineer should contribute to assess the priority. The expert tester is the only one who should contribute to assess the detection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Venita
13 days ago
B) The aircraft pilot and the customer representative should contribute to assess the priority. The chief software engineer, the system architect and the expert tester should contribute to assess the detection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Xochitl
25 days ago
A) The aircraft pilot and the customer representative should contribute to assess the detection. The chief software engineer, the system architect and the expert tester should contribute to assess the priority.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tiffiny
2 months ago
Haha, the aircraft pilot must be moonlighting as a TV technician. I wonder if he also doubles as a plumber on the weekends.
upvoted 0 times
Yolande
5 days ago
B) The aircraft pilot and the customer representative should contribute to assess the priority. The chief software engineer, the system architect and the expert tester should contribute to assess the detection.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marsha
7 days ago
Haha, the aircraft pilot must be moonlighting as a TV technician. I wonder if he also doubles as a plumber on the weekends.
upvoted 0 times
...
Minna
15 days ago
A) The aircraft pilot and the customer representative should contribute to assess the detection. The chief software engineer, the system architect and the expert tester should contribute to assess the priority.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ula
2 months ago
I agree, the aircraft pilot is completely irrelevant here. This question is testing our understanding of stakeholder involvement in a failure mode analysis for a Pay-TV system. The key is to identify the appropriate stakeholders based on their expertise.
upvoted 0 times
Noble
1 months ago
I agree, the aircraft pilot is completely irrelevant here. This question is testing our understanding of stakeholder involvement in a failure mode analysis for a Pay-TV system. The key is to identify the appropriate stakeholders based on their expertise.
upvoted 0 times
...
Theresia
1 months ago
A) The aircraft pilot and the customer representative should contribute to assess the detection. The chief software engineer, the system architect and the expert tester should contribute to assess the priority.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Katie
2 months ago
The question is clearly focused on a Conditional Access System for Pay-TV, not an aircraft system. I'm not sure why the aircraft pilot is even mentioned. Seems like a random distractor.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisha
2 months ago
I believe option A is the most effective, involving the aircraft pilot, customer representative, chief software engineer, system architect, and expert tester.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daren
2 months ago
I agree, having input from different roles will provide a more comprehensive analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adell
2 months ago
I think the stakeholders should work together to assess both detection and priority.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77