Option B is the way to go - who doesn't love a good promotion? I'm picturing the testers receiving their awards while riding on the shoulders of grateful developers. Hey, a guy can dream, right?
I'd be more motivated if the test cases included finding hidden treasure or slaying mythical beasts. Alas, C is the most likely reality for us mere mortals.
Option A is the clear winner here. If the resources are insufficient, how can we deliver quality? Testers need the tools and time to do their jobs effectively. Otherwise, it's like trying to build a house with a pocket knife.
Ah, the joys of testing. Option D is my pick - asking testers to do unrelated tasks is a sure-fire way to make them feel undervalued and unappreciated. I'd rather be chasing bugs than filing expense reports!
I'm going to have to go with C on this one. Doing the same repetitive tests without any improvement is a surefire way to demotivate the testing team. Where's the challenge?
I disagree. I believe option A is more motivating because having insufficient resources can push testers to find creative solutions and improve the quality of the product.
Option B seems the most motivating to me. Recognition and increased responsibilities are great ways to keep testers engaged and committed to the organization.
Cheryl
1 months agoDevora
1 months agoSanjuana
9 days agoBrice
15 days agoAlita
17 days agoMoira
1 months agoKendra
1 months agoRodolfo
18 days agoTonja
1 months agoEdna
1 months agoKeena
2 months agoCherri
10 days agoKerry
20 days agoColton
1 months agoDorothy
2 months agoLeana
2 months agoDiego
2 months agoElouise
1 months agoMarion
1 months agoTijuana
1 months agoCletus
2 months agoBobbie
2 months agoYoulanda
2 months agoWalker
2 months ago