Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

iSQI Exam CTAL-TA_Syll2019 Topic 1 Question 36 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTAL-TA_Syll2019 exam
Question #: 36
Topic #: 1
[All CTAL-TA_Syll2019 Questions]

The Technical Test Analyst has created a suite of keyword-driven tests to be used to test a calendar creation application. Because users may enter erroneous data, error checking must be

handled with the automation. What is the best way to test the error conditions and still use the keyword-driven tests?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

The correct answer is A. Create test data for the keywords that includes error data and verifies the proper error is returned.

Create test data for the keywords that includes error data and verifies the proper error is returned

This is the best way to test the error conditions and still use the keyword-driven tests because it allows the reuse of the existing keywords and functions, while providing different inputs and expected outputs for the test cases. It also ensures that the error checking is automated and consistent, and that the test coverage is adequate1.

Reference =

Keyword Driven Testing Framework with Example2, Section How to create Keyword Driven Framework

What is Keyword Driven Testing: A Detailed Tutorial With Examples3, Section How to perform Keyword Driven Testing

KEYWORD DRIVEN TESTING4, Section How to do Keyword Driven Testing


by Joseph at Apr 08, 2024, 07:49 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTAL-TA_Syll2019 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Alesia
11 months ago
I would go with option D. Manual tests can ensure proper handling of error conditions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billy
11 months ago
Creating new keywords for the error situations seems to be the most efficient option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tabetha
11 months ago
I disagree. I believe option B is more thorough and covers all possible errors.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christiane
11 months ago
I think option A is the best way to test error conditions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Micah
11 months ago
Yes, manual tests can ensure that all error conditions are properly covered
upvoted 0 times
...
Douglass
11 months ago
I think creating manual tests for the error conditions is important as well
upvoted 0 times
...
Donette
12 months ago
That could work too, but I think creating test data with error data is more efficient
upvoted 0 times
...
Myra
12 months ago
What about creating new keywords to handle the error situations?
upvoted 0 times
...
Micah
12 months ago
I agree, that way we can ensure the proper error is returned
upvoted 0 times
...
Donette
12 months ago
I think the best way is to create test data with error data for the keywords
upvoted 0 times
Daniel
11 months ago
D) Create manual tests for the error conditions and provide only valid data for the keyword tests
upvoted 0 times
...
Jaime
11 months ago
B) Create a suite of data-driven tests that will provide all possible errors
upvoted 0 times
...
Oren
12 months ago
A) Create test data for the keywords that includes error data and verifies the proper error is returned
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leota
1 years ago
Hmm, I don't know. I'm kind of leaning towards option B. It just seems like the most systematic and comprehensive approach. Plus, it's the option that involves the least amount of additional work, which is always a bonus.
upvoted 0 times
...
Melynda
1 years ago
You know, I'm kind of with Lisha on this one. Creating new keywords for the error conditions seems like a really elegant solution. It keeps the keyword-driven tests nice and organized, and it makes the error handling really explicit.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
1 years ago
I think option D is a cop-out. We should be testing the error conditions just as thoroughly as the happy path. Providing only valid data for the keyword tests seems like it would leave a huge gap in our test coverage.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lisha
1 years ago
I don't know, you guys. Option C, creating new keywords to handle the error situations, might be the way to go. That way, we can keep the keyword-driven tests clean and focused, and have a separate set of keywords for error handling.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alisha
1 years ago
I'm not sure about that. Option B, creating a suite of data-driven tests, might be a better way to go. That way, we can systematically test all the possible error scenarios without having to create new keywords for each one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracia
1 years ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I think the best approach would be to go with option A. Creating test data that includes error data and verifying the proper error is returned seems like the most comprehensive way to handle this. The keyword-driven tests are great for the happy path, but we need to make sure we're also covering the error conditions.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77