iSQI Exam CTAL-ATT Topic 6 Question 36 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CTAL-ATT exam

Question #: 36
Topic #: 6

Your team is developing an e-shop application (the SUT) that will use a third-party service to process payments via an API. This third-party payment gateway is itself still under development Which statement contains a pair of benefits that can BOTH be expected from service virtualization in this circumstance'

SELECT ONE OPTION

AEarlier discovery of defects in the SUT; the ability to share code between the SUT and the payment gateway.

BParallel compilation, continuous integration, and test automation; more effective configuration management.

CRealistic testing of the SUT before the actual payment gateway is available, simplification of the test environment

DEarlier testing of the API, reduction in the amount of test data needed

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Johnetta at May 30, 2024, 10:13 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CTAL-ATT Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Kenny

1 months ago

I'm with Virgina on this one. The payment gateway is like a temperamental artist, and we need to be able to practice our routine without them throwing a fit every time we mess up. Service virtualization is the way to go!

upvoted 0 times

...

Virgina

1 months ago

C is the clear winner here. Earlier testing of the API and reducing test data needs are game-changers. Plus, it's like the payment gateway is a diva, and we need to rehearse the performance before the big show!

upvoted 0 times

Daron

2 days ago

C is definitely the way to go. Testing the API early on is crucial.

upvoted 0 times

...

Val

2 months ago

Hmm, I'm not sure I agree with B. Parallel compilation and continuous integration are great, but they don't really address the challenges of testing the SUT when the payment gateway is still in development. I'd go with C.

upvoted 0 times

Gabriele

1 months ago

Yeah, C also simplifies the test environment which can be really helpful in this situation.

upvoted 0 times

...

Johnna

1 months ago

I agree, C seems like the best option for realistic testing of the SUT before the actual payment gateway is available.

upvoted 0 times

...

Karrie

2 months ago

But option A also makes sense, earlier discovery of defects can save a lot of time and effort in the long run.

upvoted 0 times

...

Martina

2 months ago

I agree, C is the way to go. Simplifying the test environment is a huge plus when dealing with a third-party service that's still under development. Reduces the complexity and headaches.

upvoted 0 times

Minna

1 months ago

I agree, C is the way to go. Simplifying the test environment is a huge plus when dealing with a third-party service that's still under development. Reduces the complexity and headaches.

upvoted 0 times

...

Edmond

1 months ago

C) Realistic testing of the SUT before the actual payment gateway is available, simplification of the test environment

upvoted 0 times

...

Phung

2 months ago

B) Parallel compilation, continuous integration, and test automation; more effective configuration management.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nada

2 months ago

A) Earlier discovery of defects in the SUT; the ability to share code between the SUT and the payment gateway.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ashlyn

2 months ago

Absolutely, C is the correct answer! Service virtualization allows us to simulate the payment gateway and test the SUT realistically before the actual gateway is ready. That's a huge benefit in this case.

upvoted 0 times

...

Stevie

2 months ago

I agree with Hershel, testing the SUT before the actual payment gateway is available is crucial.

upvoted 0 times

...

Hershel

3 months ago

I think option C is the best choice.

upvoted 0 times

...