Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

iSQI Exam CT-AI Topic 4 Question 16 Discussion

Actual exam question for iSQI's CT-AI exam
Question #: 16
Topic #: 4
[All CT-AI Questions]

Which of the following is one of the reasons for data mislabelling?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Pairwise testing is used to handle the large number of combinations of parameters that can arise in complex systems like self-driving cars. The question asks which of the given options is least likely to be a reason for the explosion in the number of parameters.

Different Road Types (A): Self-driving cars must operate on various road types, such as highways, city streets, rural roads, etc. Each road type can have different characteristics, requiring the car's system to adapt and handle different scenarios. Thus, this is a significant factor contributing to the growth of parameters.

Different Weather Conditions (B): Weather conditions such as rain, snow, fog, and bright sunlight significantly affect the performance of self-driving cars. The car's sensors and algorithms must adapt to these varying conditions, which adds to the number of parameters that need to be considered.

ML Model Metrics to Evaluate Functional Performance (C): While evaluating machine learning (ML) model performance is crucial, it does not directly contribute to the explosion of parameter combinations in the same way that road types, weather conditions, and car features do. Metrics are used to measure and assess performance but are not themselves variable conditions that the system must handle.

Different Features like ADAS, Lane Change Assistance, etc. (D): Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) and other features add complexity to self-driving cars. Each feature can have multiple settings and operational modes, contributing to the overall number of parameters.

Hence, the least likely reason for the incredible growth in the number of parameters is C. ML model metrics to evaluate the functional performance.


ISTQB CT-AI Syllabus Section 9.2 on Pairwise Testing discusses the application of this technique to manage the combinations of different variables in AI-based systems, including those used in self-driving cars.

Sample Exam Questions document, Question #29 provides context for the explosion in parameter combinations in self-driving cars and highlights the use of pairwise testing as a method to manage this complexity.

Contribute your Thoughts:

Regenia
28 days ago
Clearly, the answer is 'Lack of caffeine'. How can you label data properly without a steady supply of coffee?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ruthann
1 months ago
I bet the real reason is that the data was labeled by a bunch of 'expert' monkeys. Just a wild hypothesis, of course.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laticia
1 months ago
Ooh, 'Small datasets' sounds juicy. You can't always trust those tiny samples, am I right?
upvoted 0 times
Leota
1 days ago
C) Interoperability error
upvoted 0 times
...
Salena
2 days ago
B) Expert knowledge
upvoted 0 times
...
Olive
9 days ago
A) Lack of domain knowledge
upvoted 0 times
...
Markus
16 days ago
A) Lack of domain knowledge
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ardella
2 months ago
I'm feeling 'Interoperability error' on this one. Gotta make sure all those data formats are playing nice, you know?
upvoted 0 times
Gladys
10 days ago
I agree, mislabeling can easily occur if the data formats are not compatible.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stevie
13 days ago
Definitely, it's important to ensure all data formats can work together smoothly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Denny
15 days ago
Yeah, interoperability errors can really mess things up.
upvoted 0 times
...
Albert
25 days ago
D) Small datasets
upvoted 0 times
...
Romana
1 months ago
C) Interoperability error
upvoted 0 times
...
Adolph
1 months ago
B) Expert knowledge
upvoted 0 times
...
Jarod
1 months ago
A) Lack of domain knowledge
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lilli
2 months ago
I'm going to have to go with 'Expert knowledge' on this one. Who better to label the data than the experts themselves?
upvoted 0 times
Brandon
15 days ago
C) Interoperability error
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherrie
24 days ago
B) Expert knowledge
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeannetta
1 months ago
A) Lack of domain knowledge
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chaya
2 months ago
Hmm, I'd say 'Lack of domain knowledge' seems like the most likely culprit. How can you label data properly without understanding the context?
upvoted 0 times
...
Eric
2 months ago
I think interoperability error could also be a reason for data mislabelling. Different systems not communicating properly could lead to mistakes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sean
2 months ago
I agree with Carin. Without proper domain knowledge, it's easy to mislabel data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carin
3 months ago
I think the reason for data mislabelling could be lack of domain knowledge.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77