Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

ISM Exam LEAD Topic 5 Question 1 Discussion

Actual exam question for ISM's LEAD exam
Question #: 1
Topic #: 5
[All LEAD Questions]

A company has a strict policy of limiting employee gifts from suppliers to no more than S25. An employee violates this policy by accepting an $80 ticket to a sporting event from a regular supplier. Given this situation, which of the following is the BEST course of action for this employee's supervisor to take?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Policy Violation: The employee violated the company's strict gift policy by accepting an $80 ticket, which exceeds the $25 limit.

Appropriate Response: Conducting face-to-face training addresses the issue by educating the employee on the company's policies and the importance of adhering to them.

Corrective Action: This approach allows for a constructive discussion, ensuring the employee understands the policy and the reasons behind it, which can prevent future violations.

Proportional Response: While dismissal or other punitive measures may seem excessive for a first-time or minor infraction, training provides a balanced approach to correction and improvement.

Reference: Human resource management best practices emphasize the importance of training and education in addressing policy violations, as discussed in resources like 'Human Resource Management' by Gary Dessler and guidelines from the Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM).


Contribute your Thoughts:

Shenika
10 months ago
Wow, an $80 ticket to a sporting event? That's one heck of a 'gift'! I guess the supplier was really trying to 'score' some points with the employee, huh?
upvoted 0 times
King
10 months ago
D) Warn the supplier that its contract will be terminated if any such gift is given again
upvoted 0 times
...
Norah
10 months ago
A) Conduct face-to-face training with the employee on company policy
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lyndia
10 months ago
I dunno, I'm kind of torn on this one. A face-to-face training session could be a good way to re-emphasize the policy and make sure the employee understands it. But I also see the merit in D, sending a strong message to the supplier.
upvoted 0 times
Carry
10 months ago
D) Warn the supplier that its contract will be terminated if any such gift is given again
upvoted 0 times
...
Minna
10 months ago
A) Conduct face-to-face training with the employee on company policy
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Minna
11 months ago
That's a good point, face-to-face training could prevent future violations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Maddie
11 months ago
But what if the employee didn't know about the policy? Maybe some training would help.
upvoted 0 times
...
Launa
11 months ago
I agree, a warning would be appropriate in this situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Georgiana
11 months ago
I agree with Felix. D is definitely the way to go. The employee made a mistake, but the focus should be on addressing the supplier's behavior rather than punishing the employee too harshly. Gotta nip this in the bud before it becomes a bigger problem.
upvoted 0 times
Sina
10 months ago
Definitely, let's focus on preventing this from happening in the future.
upvoted 0 times
...
Walton
10 months ago
Agreed, the supplier needs to be warned so this doesn't happen again.
upvoted 0 times
...
Domitila
10 months ago
I think D is the best option here. We need to make sure the supplier knows the rules.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Minna
11 months ago
I think the employee should be warned about violating company policy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felix
11 months ago
Hmm, I think the best option here is D. Warn the supplier and let them know that this kind of gift-giving is strictly against company policy. Firing the employee seems a bit harsh, and deducting the money from their paycheck doesn't really address the root issue.
upvoted 0 times
Tamesha
11 months ago
I think face-to-face training with the employee could also be beneficial to ensure they understand the policy moving forward.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eliseo
11 months ago
I agree, warning the supplier is the best course of action. It sets a clear boundary for future interactions.
upvoted 0 times
...
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77