Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Isaca Exam IT Risk Fundamentals Topic 4 Question 2 Discussion

Actual exam question for Isaca's IT Risk Fundamentals exam
Question #: 2
Topic #: 4
[All IT Risk Fundamentals Questions]

As part of the control monitoring process, frequent control exceptions are MOST likely to indicate:

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Control Monitoring Process:

The control monitoring process involves regular review and assessment of controls to ensure they are operating effectively and as intended.

Frequent Control Exceptions:

Frequent exceptions in control processes often indicate that the controls are not aligning well with the business priorities or operational needs.

This misalignment can occur when controls are too rigid, outdated, or not suited to the current business environment, leading to frequent violations or bypassing of controls.

Comparison of Options:

A excessive costs associated with the use of a control might be a concern, but it is not the primary reason for frequent exceptions.

C high risk appetite throughout the enterprise might lead to more accepted risks but does not directly explain frequent control exceptions.

Conclusion:

Therefore, frequent control exceptions are most likely to indicate misalignment with business priorities.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Dalene
5 months ago
Option A sounds like the winner to me. Unless, of course, the controls are just there to keep the auditors entertained. Then all bets are off!
upvoted 0 times
...
Wendell
5 months ago
You know what they say, 'When in doubt, blame the risk appetite.' But in this case, I'm gonna have to go with A. Gotta keep those costs in check, folks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Major
5 months ago
High risk appetite? Really? I think the control team's been hitting the eggnog a little too hard. C is way off base.
upvoted 0 times
Burma
4 months ago
B) misalignment with business priorities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Natalie
4 months ago
A) excessive costs associated with use of a control.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Brinda
5 months ago
I believe control exceptions could also indicate high risk appetite throughout the enterprise.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alita
5 months ago
B, all the way. If the controls are out of sync with business priorities, that's a recipe for disaster. Might as well just throw the whole system out the window.
upvoted 0 times
Breana
5 months ago
C) high risk appetite throughout the enterprise.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mauricio
5 months ago
B) misalignment with business priorities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dusti
5 months ago
A) excessive costs associated with use of a control.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gail
5 months ago
I'd say option A. Excessive control costs are a red flag that something's not right with the monitoring process. Gotta keep an eye on those numbers, ya know?
upvoted 0 times
Tiera
5 months ago
That's a good point. It's important to consider all possibilities when analyzing control exceptions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carin
5 months ago
But what about option C? High risk appetite could also result in frequent control exceptions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merissa
5 months ago
I agree, option B makes sense. It's important to ensure that controls are in line with the overall goals of the business.
upvoted 0 times
...
Patti
5 months ago
I think it could also be option B. Misalignment with business priorities can lead to control exceptions.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Leslee
6 months ago
I agree with Dulce. It's important for controls to be in line with business goals.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dulce
6 months ago
I think frequent control exceptions indicate misalignment with business priorities.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77