Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Isaca Exam IT Risk Fundamentals Topic 4 Question 12 Discussion

Actual exam question for Isaca's IT Risk Fundamentals exam
Question #: 12
Topic #: 4
[All IT Risk Fundamentals Questions]

Which of the following is the BEST reason for an enterprise to avoid an absolute prohibition on risk?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Purpose of Monitoring Control Statuses:

Organizations monitor control statuses to ensure that the controls in place are functioning correctly and achieving their intended outcomes.

Providing Assurance:

Monitoring control statuses provides assurance that the organization is compliant with established standards, regulations, and internal policies.

Compliance is a critical aspect of governance and risk management, ensuring that the organization operates within legal and regulatory frameworks.

Comparison of Options:

B ensuring risk events are fully mitigated is an important aspect but is secondary to the overarching goal of compliance.

C meeting ROI objectives is related to financial performance but does not directly relate to the primary purpose of control monitoring, which is compliance.

Conclusion:

Thus, the primary reason for monitoring control statuses is to provide assurance that compliance with established standards is achieved.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Stephaine
27 days ago
I'd go with B. An absolute prohibition on risk is like trying to live in a bubble - it's just not practical in the real world of business.
upvoted 0 times
...
Madelyn
29 days ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I bet the correct answer is B, but I might be biased because I once fell asleep during a risk management lecture. Oops!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cristal
1 months ago
C seems like the most relevant choice. Without proper budget support, risk management initiatives will always fall short.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elvera
1 months ago
I'm leaning towards A. An executive team that doesn't understand the nuances of risk management is a recipe for disaster.
upvoted 0 times
Dorothy
2 days ago
I agree, if the executives don't understand the risks, they can't make informed decisions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Azzie
5 days ago
A) It may not be understood by executive management.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Remona
2 months ago
I think B is the best answer. An absolute prohibition on risk could lead to inefficient use of resources and stifle innovation.
upvoted 0 times
Eveline
4 days ago
True, but A is also valid. If executive management doesn't understand the prohibition, it could cause confusion.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earnestine
8 days ago
I think C is also important. Without taking risks, we may not be able to support budget increases.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wenona
10 days ago
I agree, B makes sense. We need to take calculated risks to move forward.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alisha
2 months ago
But what about C) It may not provide adequate support for budget increases? Without taking some risks, how can we expect to see any financial growth?
upvoted 0 times
...
Von
2 months ago
I agree with Rosendo. If we avoid all risks, we might miss out on opportunities for growth.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
3 months ago
I think the best reason is B) It may lead to ineffective use of resources.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77