Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Isaca Exam CRISC Topic 5 Question 86 Discussion

Actual exam question for Isaca's CRISC exam
Question #: 86
Topic #: 5
[All CRISC Questions]

Which of the following is MOST helpful when prioritizing action plans for identified risk?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Bettyann
1 months ago
I'll have to go with option A. It's like choosing the flavor of ice cream - you need to know your appetite before you can decide which one to get!
upvoted 0 times
...
Tanesha
1 months ago
Option D is the way to go! Ranking risks based on likelihood is the foundation for any good risk management strategy. The other options are just secondary considerations.
upvoted 0 times
Mitzie
8 days ago
Yes, ranking risks by likelihood helps us address the most critical issues first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Aliza
12 days ago
I agree, it's important to focus on the most probable risks first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Miesha
17 days ago
Option D is definitely the best choice. Prioritizing based on likelihood is key.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Candida
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not sure. Option C seems more practical to me. Knowing the cost of controls is important to make informed decisions and allocate resources effectively.
upvoted 0 times
Chauncey
12 days ago
Yes, prioritizing action plans based on the cost of controls can definitely help in effective resource allocation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glenna
15 days ago
I agree, understanding the cost of controls helps in making informed decisions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Garry
1 months ago
Option C does seem practical. Knowing the cost of controls is crucial for resource allocation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ahmed
2 months ago
I would go with option B. Getting input from the business units is crucial to understand the true impact of the risks and how they should be addressed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leontine
2 months ago
Comparing risk rating against appetite is definitely the most helpful in prioritizing action plans. It gives you a clear picture of how much risk the organization is willing to accept.
upvoted 0 times
Jordan
1 months ago
B) Obtaining input from business units
upvoted 0 times
...
Bronwyn
2 months ago
A) Comparing risk rating against appetite
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carlota
2 months ago
I prefer C) Determining cost of controls to mitigate risk. It's important to consider financial implications.
upvoted 0 times
...
Susana
2 months ago
I agree with Jerilyn. It helps in aligning actions with organizational goals.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jerilyn
3 months ago
I think A) Comparing risk rating against appetite is the most helpful.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77