Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Isaca Exam CRISC Topic 3 Question 73 Discussion

Actual exam question for Isaca's CRISC exam
Question #: 73
Topic #: 3
[All CRISC Questions]

Which of the following is a drawback in the use of quantitative risk analysis?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Barrett
1 months ago
Hmm, I was hoping for an answer that involved unicorns or rainbows. That would have been a real drawback! But I suppose resources and effort are important too.
upvoted 0 times
Leonida
7 days ago
Unicorns and rainbows would definitely make risk analysis more fun though!
upvoted 0 times
...
Ramonita
14 days ago
It's true, resources and effort are key factors in quantitative risk analysis.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Providencia
1 months ago
I was thinking Option C, but I guess that's actually a benefit, not a drawback. Numeric results are more concrete and easier to interpret.
upvoted 0 times
Shaunna
2 days ago
Option A: It can be time-consuming to gather all the necessary data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Christene
7 days ago
Option C: Lack of flexibility in adjusting for changing circumstances
upvoted 0 times
...
Kerrie
8 days ago
Option B: Time-consuming process to gather and analyze data
upvoted 0 times
...
Sol
16 days ago
Option A: Difficulty in assigning numerical values to all risks
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Dominga
2 months ago
I agree with Angella. Quantitative analysis is more time-consuming and expensive, but it provides more precise and data-driven results.
upvoted 0 times
Salley
29 days ago
I guess it depends on the specific needs of the project.
upvoted 0 times
...
Crista
1 months ago
True, it's a trade-off between time and accuracy.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sanjuana
1 months ago
But on the other hand, it does give more precise results based on data.
upvoted 0 times
...
Charlene
1 months ago
I think one drawback is that it can be time-consuming and expensive.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Angella
2 months ago
Option B is the correct answer. Quantitative risk analysis does require more resources, such as time and expert knowledge, to implement compared to other methods.
upvoted 0 times
Fletcher
1 months ago
That's true, quantitative risk analysis can be resource-intensive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Fanny
2 months ago
B) It requires more resources than other methods
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Izetta
2 months ago
But doesn't it also produce results in numeric form, which can be helpful for decision-making?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquelyne
3 months ago
I agree with Felicitas. Quantitative risk analysis can be resource-intensive.
upvoted 0 times
...
Felicitas
3 months ago
I think the drawback is that it requires more resources.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77