Isaca Exam CRISC Topic 11 Question 87 Discussion

Actual exam question for Isaca's CRISC exam

Question #: 87
Topic #: 11

[All CRISC Questions]

When classifying and prioritizing risk responses, the areas to address FIRST are those with:

Alow cost effectiveness ratios and high risk levels

Bhigh cost effectiveness ratios and low risk levels.

Chigh cost effectiveness ratios and high risk levels

Dlow cost effectiveness ratios and low risk levels.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: C

by Glenn at Sep 16, 2024, 10:16 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium CRISC Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Kris

8 months ago

Honestly, I'm just hoping the exam doesn't ask me to classify the risk of my exam performance. That's a whole other can of worms!

upvoted 0 times

Katina

7 months ago

B) high cost effectiveness ratios and low risk levels.

upvoted 0 times

...

Cherelle

8 months ago

C) high cost effectiveness ratios and high risk levels

upvoted 0 times

...

Tashia

8 months ago

A) low cost effectiveness ratios and high risk levels

upvoted 0 times

...

Benton

9 months ago

Haha, these options are like a game of Risk - go big or go home, am I right? I'm voting for C, the high-stakes play!

upvoted 0 times

...

Charlette

9 months ago

I think B sounds good. If the risk is low, why waste resources on it? Let's focus on the big-ticket items first.

upvoted 0 times

Dorcas

7 months ago

True, finding the right balance is key in managing risk responses effectively.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gladys

7 months ago

That's a good point. Maybe we should consider a balance between low and high risk items.

upvoted 0 times

...

Gussie

8 months ago

True, we need to find a balance between cost and risk. Maybe a combination of both high and low risk levels is the best approach.

upvoted 0 times

...

Therese

8 months ago

But what if the low risk items end up causing major issues later on?

upvoted 0 times

...

Caprice

8 months ago

I agree, focusing on high cost effectiveness ratios and low risk levels makes sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Catarina

8 months ago

But what about the risks with high cost effectiveness ratios and high risk levels? Shouldn't we address those first?

upvoted 0 times

...

Pamella

9 months ago

I agree, it's important to prioritize efficiently. High cost effectiveness ratios and low risk levels make sense.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ronnie

9 months ago

But wouldn't it make more sense to prioritize high risk levels first, even if the cost effectiveness ratio is high?

upvoted 0 times

...

Vernell

9 months ago

C'mon, it's gotta be the high cost effectiveness ratios and high risk levels! That's the whole point of prioritizing, right?

upvoted 0 times

Kayleigh

8 months ago

True, addressing high risk areas with high cost effectiveness ratios can lead to better risk management.

upvoted 0 times

...

Merlyn

8 months ago

I think the priority should be on high cost effectiveness ratios and high risk levels to minimize impact.

upvoted 0 times

...

Kristine

8 months ago

But what about low cost effectiveness ratios and high risk levels? Shouldn't we address those as well?

upvoted 0 times

...

Tomas

8 months ago

I agree, we should focus on high cost effectiveness ratios and high risk levels first.

upvoted 0 times

...

Jackie

9 months ago

I disagree, I believe the answer is C.

upvoted 0 times

...

Ronnie

9 months ago

I think the answer is B.

upvoted 0 times

...