Hmm, let's see... the element most likely to change is the one that's the most fun to play with, like a risk yo-yo. My money's on 'Risk velocity' - because who doesn't love a good old-fashioned game of 'How Fast Can We Spin This Risk?'
I'm pretty sure the answer is 'All of the above' - because management's risk appetite changes as often as the weather, and we're expected to keep up with it like professional weather forecasters!
A. Key risk indicator (KRI) thresholds are the most likely to change, as they are designed to align with the organization's risk appetite. If the appetite changes, the KRI thresholds will need to be adjusted accordingly.
B. Inherent risk is the most likely to change, as it reflects the level of risk before any controls or mitigations are in place. Management's risk appetite can significantly impact the inherent risk assessment.
D. Risk velocity is the most likely to change as a result of changes in management's risk appetite. The speed at which risks can materialize is closely tied to the organization's willingness to accept certain levels of risk.
I think the answer is C. Risk likelihood and impact are directly tied to the organization's risk appetite, which can change over time based on management's priorities.
Penney
1 months agoDonette
1 months agoMyrtie
5 days agoYolande
7 days agoFannie
20 days agoMiss
1 months agoCordelia
5 days agoTesha
13 days agoOzell
30 days agoNoel
2 months agoLou
1 months agoDetra
1 months agoCherelle
1 months agoFrederic
2 months agoMammie
2 months agoSilva
2 months agoAlton
2 months agoNida
2 months ago