Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Isaca Exam CRISC Topic 1 Question 76 Discussion

Actual exam question for Isaca's CRISC exam
Question #: 76
Topic #: 1
[All CRISC Questions]

In an organization where each division manages risk independently, which of the following would BEST enable management of risk at the enterprise level?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Alona
1 months ago
I bet the exam writers are sitting back and chuckling at us, trying to figure out the 'right' answer. Maybe they just want to see how creatively we can argue our points!
upvoted 0 times
...
Buck
1 months ago
Ah, the age-old question of 'which risk management solution is the best?' It's like trying to pick the perfect flavor of ice cream - they're all delicious in their own way!
upvoted 0 times
...
Raina
1 months ago
An updated risk tolerance metric? Really? I feel like that's just putting a band-aid on the problem. We need a more comprehensive approach to enterprise-wide risk management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leonardo
1 months ago
I disagree, a list of control deficiencies would be a great starting point. That way, we can address the gaps in our risk management processes before worrying about policies and metrics.
upvoted 0 times
Veta
13 days ago
I think having a centralized risk management policy would help us align all divisions and ensure consistency.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Alva
1 months ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure about that. A standardized risk taxonomy seems like it would be a more practical solution to enable consistent risk identification and assessment across the divisions.
upvoted 0 times
Cecil
17 days ago
It would also make it easier to aggregate and compare risks across different divisions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Karan
19 days ago
I agree, having a common language for discussing risks can definitely improve communication and understanding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamaria
28 days ago
Standardized risk taxonomy would definitely help in ensuring consistent risk identification and assessment.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Chana
2 months ago
I'm not sure about that. I think C) An enterprise risk ownership policy could also be a good option to ensure accountability for managing risk across the organization.
upvoted 0 times
...
Patria
2 months ago
I think an enterprise risk ownership policy would be the best option to manage risk at the enterprise level. This would clearly define roles and responsibilities for risk management across the organization.
upvoted 0 times
Alyce
19 days ago
Having a list of control deficiencies would help identify areas that need improvement in risk management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eun
20 days ago
An enterprise risk ownership policy would ensure accountability and coordination in managing risk at the enterprise level.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daniel
22 days ago
I disagree, I believe an updated risk tolerance metric would provide a better overview of risk across all divisions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wai
26 days ago
I think a standardized risk taxonomy would be more effective in managing risk at the enterprise level.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Tayna
2 months ago
I agree with Ethan. Having a standardized risk taxonomy would help manage risk at the enterprise level by providing a common language for all divisions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ethan
3 months ago
I think the answer is A) A standardized risk taxonomy.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77