Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Isaca Exam COBIT-Design-and-Implementation Topic 6 Question 3 Discussion

Actual exam question for Isaca's COBIT-Design-and-Implementation exam
Question #: 3
Topic #: 6
[All COBIT-Design-and-Implementation Questions]

Which of the following is BEST suited for evaluating the performance of processes?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

Key goal indicators (KGIs) are best suited for evaluating the performance of processes. KGIs measure the outcome of processes and indicate whether the objectives are being met, providing a clear picture of performance.

Reference in COBIT 2019 Design and Implementation:

COBIT 2019 Framework: Governance and Management Objectives, MEA01 (Managed Performance and Conformance Monitoring): This objective highlights the use of key goal indicators to measure and monitor the performance of governance and management processes.

COBIT 2019 Implementation Guide, Chapter 5: This chapter discusses the importance of using KGIs to evaluate process performance and ensure alignment with enterprise goals.

By focusing on KGIs, enterprises can effectively monitor and evaluate the success of their processes in achieving desired outcomes, leading to continuous improvement and better alignment with business objectives.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Ellen
10 months ago
I think it could also be D) Key goal indicators to track progress towards goals.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adolph
10 months ago
But capability levels help measure the maturity of processes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chaya
10 months ago
Aligned goals? More like 'misaligned chaos', am I right? Let's keep it simple with key goal indicators.
upvoted 0 times
...
Daren
10 months ago
I'm gonna go with key performance areas. It's like a Swiss army knife for evaluating processes. Does everything and more!
upvoted 0 times
Lorriane
9 months ago
Capability levels are crucial for evaluating process performance. It shows what the team is capable of achieving.
upvoted 0 times
...
Giuseppe
9 months ago
I prefer aligned goals for evaluating performance. It helps keep everything on track.
upvoted 0 times
...
Billi
9 months ago
I think key performance areas are the way to go. They cover all aspects of process evaluation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Pearly
10 months ago
I disagree, I believe it's A) Key performance areas.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adolph
10 months ago
I think the answer is C) Capability levels.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alecia
10 months ago
Key goal indicators, baby! You gotta have some hard numbers to crunch, right? Otherwise, it's all just guesswork.
upvoted 0 times
...
Raylene
10 months ago
That's true, but capability levels can also provide a comprehensive view of process performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lettie
10 months ago
Capability levels, all the way! It's about measuring what people can actually do, not just some abstract goal.
upvoted 0 times
...
Freida
10 months ago
Nah, aligned goals are where it's at. You gotta make sure everyone's on the same page, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Claudio
10 months ago
I think key performance areas are the way to go. It's a holistic approach that looks at the big picture.
upvoted 0 times
Dacia
10 months ago
C) Capability levels
upvoted 0 times
...
Amos
10 months ago
Capability levels can also be useful for evaluating process performance, it shows the organization's readiness to meet goals.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ayesha
10 months ago
A) Key performance areas
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorita
10 months ago
I think aligned goals are important too, they help ensure that everyone is working towards the same objectives.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nida
10 months ago
I agree, key performance areas give a comprehensive view of how processes are performing.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cassandra
10 months ago
But don't you think key performance areas are more specific and directly related to evaluating performance?
upvoted 0 times
...
Raylene
11 months ago
I disagree, I believe it's C) Capability levels.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cassandra
11 months ago
I think the answer is A) Key performance areas.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77