Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Isaca Exam COBIT-2019 Topic 5 Question 56 Discussion

Actual exam question for Isaca's COBIT-2019 exam
Question #: 56
Topic #: 5
[All COBIT-2019 Questions]

When tailoring the COBIT organization structure to organizational context and priorities, which of the following should be done NEXT after mapping organizational structures with specific responsibility or accountability?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

According to the Official COBIT 2019 Study Manual from Isaca, the CIO and the program steering committee are responsible for performing a stakeholder satisfaction survey and gathering feedback on lessons learned from the implementation of an EGIT program plan. This includes gathering and evaluating information from the stakeholders, as well as assessing program objectives and performance and making any necessary adjustments to ensure that the program is successful.

The CIO is responsible for ensuring that the implementation of the program aligns with the overall IT strategy and that the program is effective in delivering the desired results. The program steering committee is responsible for providing oversight and guidance for the implementation of the program.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Alita
1 months ago
Adapt the COBIT roles? Sounds like a job for a structural engineer and a circus acrobat. I hope they're not afraid of heights!
upvoted 0 times
Teddy
7 days ago
C) Add two levels of involvement for consulted and informed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Janey
14 days ago
B) Revise the organizational hierarchy with job descriptions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lelia
16 days ago
A) Adapt the COBIT roles and organizational structures.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cecily
1 months ago
Adapting the COBIT roles? That's like trying to fit a square peg in a round hole. But hey, at least it's not as bad as trying to fit my entire department in there.
upvoted 0 times
Silvana
16 days ago
C) Add two levels of involvement for consulted and informed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dorinda
1 months ago
B) Revise the organizational hierarchy with job descriptions.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Candida
2 months ago
Adding two levels of involvement? What is this, a game of organizational Twister? I'll stick to the basics, thanks.
upvoted 0 times
Cordie
3 days ago
I agree, keeping it simple is usually the best approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Heike
4 days ago
C) Add two levels of involvement for consulted and informed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chandra
9 days ago
B) Revise the organizational hierarchy with job descriptions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yvette
10 days ago
A) Adapt the COBIT roles and organizational structures.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Charlene
2 months ago
Revising the organizational hierarchy? That's a whole can of worms I'd rather not open. Let's stick to the COBIT framework and keep things simple.
upvoted 0 times
...
Keena
2 months ago
Adapt the COBIT roles and organizational structures? Sounds like the logical next step to me. No need to reinvent the wheel here.
upvoted 0 times
Shelton
2 months ago
B) Revise the organizational hierarchy with job descriptions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Catina
2 months ago
A) Adapt the COBIT roles and organizational structures.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Joanna
2 months ago
I believe adding two levels of involvement for consulted and informed would also be beneficial for better communication.
upvoted 0 times
...
Marvel
2 months ago
I agree with Josephine. It's important to align the roles with the organizational context.
upvoted 0 times
...
Josephine
3 months ago
I think we should adapt the COBIT roles and organizational structures next.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77