Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

Isaca Exam COBIT-2019 Topic 1 Question 54 Discussion

Actual exam question for Isaca's COBIT-2019 exam
Question #: 54
Topic #: 1
[All COBIT-2019 Questions]

An enterprise is not having success implementing IT governance because key staff are not participating in planning meetings. What is the MOST likely underlying cause?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

The primary benefit or output derived from setting targeted capability levels and performing a capability-level gap analysis for selected processes is the identification of process improvement opportunities, according to the official COBIT 2019 Study Manual from ISACA. This gap analysis can help to identify areas where processes are not meeting their desired capability levels and can provide insight into how processes can be improved to meet their desired levels. This can help to increase efficiency and reduce costs.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Adelina
2 months ago
I'd have to go with C. If the leadership can't be bothered to show up, how can you expect the rest of the team to care? It's like trying to herd cats without a catnip supply.
upvoted 0 times
Denise
4 days ago
C) Lack of senior leadership commitment
upvoted 0 times
...
Eugene
5 days ago
B) Failure to utilize program management principles
upvoted 0 times
...
Cornell
10 days ago
A) Lack of consequences for not attending
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Carlota
2 months ago
Ooh, tough one! I'm torn between B and C, but I think the lack of senior leadership commitment is the real culprit. Can't have IT governance without the big shots on board.
upvoted 0 times
Whitney
19 days ago
Maybe they need to see the value in IT governance to fully commit to it. It's all about buy-in from the top down.
upvoted 0 times
...
Chun
20 days ago
Yeah, the top brass sets the tone for the whole organization. If they're not on board, it's an uphill battle.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebecka
23 days ago
I agree, without senior leadership commitment, it's hard to get everyone else on board.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Cherelle
2 months ago
I'm going with option C. No commitment from the top means no one else will take it seriously. Kinda like a fish rotting from the head, you know?
upvoted 0 times
...
Shawna
2 months ago
Hmm, I'd say the lack of senior leadership commitment is the most likely cause. If the big bosses don't show up, why would the key staff bother?
upvoted 0 times
...
Salley
2 months ago
Maybe there should be consequences for not attending to ensure participation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gail
3 months ago
I agree with Barbra. Without senior leadership support, it's hard to get key staff involved.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barbra
3 months ago
I think the underlying cause is lack of senior leadership commitment.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77