Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IMANET Exam CMA Topic 5 Question 97 Discussion

Actual exam question for IMANET's CMA exam
Question #: 97
Topic #: 5
[All CMA Questions]

The Stewart Co. uses the economic order quantity (EOQ) model for inventory management.A decrease in which one of the following variables would increase the EOQ?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

A firm enjoys a tax benefit upon recognizing a loss on disposal because the loss reduces book income. The old equipments book value is historical cost ($220,000) minus accumulated depreciation ($208,000).

The tax benefit is the accrual-basis loss on the disposal times the effective tax rate.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Pearlene
25 days ago
Hmm, this reminds me of that time I tried to calculate the perfect number of cookies to buy for a party. Spoiler alert: I ended up with way too many.
upvoted 0 times
...
Walton
26 days ago
Alright, time to channel my inner accountant. I'm going with D - a decrease in carrying costs. The lower the holding costs, the more you'll want to order at once.
upvoted 0 times
Magdalene
3 days ago
But what about B - cost per order? Wouldn't a decrease in that also increase the EOQ?
upvoted 0 times
...
Darrin
5 days ago
I think you're right, D makes sense. Lower carrying costs means ordering more at once.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Allene
28 days ago
Wait, what? This is too much math for me. I'm just going to guess and hope for the best.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joseph
29 days ago
C, definitely C. Lowering the safety stock level would mean you need to order more, so the EOQ would go up. Easy peasy.
upvoted 0 times
Loren
5 days ago
But wouldn't increasing the cost per order also increase the EOQ?
upvoted 0 times
...
Willard
17 days ago
I agree, lowering the safety stock level would definitely increase the EOQ.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Vallie
1 months ago
I'm pretty sure it's B - a decrease in the cost per order would increase the EOQ. Gotta love those inventory management models!
upvoted 0 times
Lore
2 days ago
I agree, it's interesting how small changes in variables can have a big impact on the EOQ.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leah
14 days ago
Yeah, that makes sense. It's all about finding that balance in inventory management.
upvoted 0 times
...
Michal
15 days ago
I think you're right, a decrease in the cost per order would definitely increase the EOQ.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Owen
1 months ago
Hmm, a decrease in carrying costs seems like the obvious answer here. The EOQ formula is all about balancing ordering and holding costs.
upvoted 0 times
Chauncey
2 days ago
C: So, if carrying costs go down, the EOQ would go up to compensate for that change.
upvoted 0 times
...
Pansy
3 days ago
B: Yeah, that makes sense. The EOQ model is all about finding that balance between ordering and holding costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Francene
29 days ago
A: I think a decrease in carrying costs would definitely increase the EOQ.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
William
2 months ago
I think a decrease in carrying costs would increase the EOQ because it would make it more expensive to hold inventory.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kaitlyn
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe a decrease in annual sales would increase the EOQ.
upvoted 0 times
...
Florinda
2 months ago
I think a decrease in cost per order would increase the EOQ.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77