IISFA Exam II0-001 Topic 4 Question 73 Discussion

Actual exam question for IISFA's II0-001 exam

Question #: 73
Topic #: 4

[All II0-001 Questions]

Port 25 forgery involves:

AManual communications with an SMTP server via telnet utility to forge header information.

BRemoved SMTP packet headers for modification.

CA 'man in the middle' attack that provides for forgery of layer 4 of the stack

DOpening at server, other than SMTP, on port 25 in order to capture inbound communications.

Show Suggested Answer

Suggested Answer: D

by Ernest at Aug 10, 2023, 06:55 PM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium II0-001 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel

Eladia

2 months ago

Wait, we can use telnet to forge SMTP headers? Brb, going to try that on my boss's computer. What could go wrong?

upvoted 0 times

Wai

3 days ago

B) Removed SMTP packet headers for modification.

upvoted 0 times

...

Margarett

4 days ago

A) Manual communications with an SMTP server via telnet utility to forge header information.

upvoted 0 times

...

Lon

15 days ago

D) Opening at server, other than SMTP, on port 25 in order to capture inbound communications.

upvoted 0 times

...

Eugene

29 days ago

C) A \'man in the middle\' attack that provides for forgery of layer 4 of the stack

upvoted 0 times

...

Corinne

1 months ago

B) Removed SMTP packet headers for modification.

upvoted 0 times

...

Carey

1 months ago

A) Manual communications with an SMTP server via telnet utility to forge header information.

upvoted 0 times

...

Melda

2 months ago

Option D is a bit of a head-scratcher. Opening a server on port 25 that's not SMTP? Sounds like a recipe for disaster.

upvoted 0 times

...

Billy

2 months ago

Option C is interesting, but a 'man in the middle' attack targeting layer 4 of the stack seems a bit overkill for just forging port 25 communications.

upvoted 0 times

...

Pedro

2 months ago

I'm not sure, but I think B) Removed SMTP packet headers for modification could also be a possibility.

upvoted 0 times

...

Nadine

2 months ago

I'm not sure about option B. Removing SMTP packet headers for modification doesn't seem like a practical approach for port 25 forgery.

upvoted 0 times

Helga

1 months ago

D) Opening at server, other than SMTP, on port 25 in order to capture inbound communications.

upvoted 0 times

...

Delisa

1 months ago

User 2: Option B) Removed SMTP packet headers for modification does seem a bit far-fetched for port 25 forgery.

upvoted 0 times

...

Sharee

1 months ago

I agree, option B does seem less practical for port 25 forgery.

upvoted 0 times

...

Tomas

1 months ago

User 1: Option A) Manual communications with an SMTP server via telnet utility to forge header information seems more plausible.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shawna

2 months ago

C) A \'man in the middle\' attack that provides for forgery of layer 4 of the stack

upvoted 0 times

...

Kimberely

2 months ago

A) Manual communications with an SMTP server via telnet utility to forge header information.

upvoted 0 times

...

Deonna

2 months ago

Option A sounds like the most plausible method for port 25 forgery. Manually communicating with an SMTP server via telnet to forge headers seems like a classic technique.

upvoted 0 times

...

Shannon

2 months ago

I disagree, I believe it's C) A 'man in the middle' attack that provides for forgery of layer 4 of the stack.

upvoted 0 times

...

Dana

3 months ago

I think the answer is A) Manual communications with an SMTP server via telnet utility to forge header information.

upvoted 0 times

...