Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IIA Exam IIA-CIA-Part1 Topic 2 Question 47 Discussion

Actual exam question for IIA's IIA-CIA-Part1 exam
Question #: 47
Topic #: 2
[All IIA-CIA-Part1 Questions]

An internal auditor assessed the controls within his organization's payroll process and suspects that erroneous payments may have been made to a fraudulent bank account. What is the best course of action for the auditor to take?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Contribute your Thoughts:

Beatriz
1 days ago
I agree with User1, we need to make sure there are no further fraudulent payments being made.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernie
2 days ago
I think the best course of action is to continue investigating the payments to confirm the accuracy of the observations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Krystina
24 days ago
I'm with Lilli on this one. If I smell a rat, I'm not going to just sit on it. Option C all the way - blow the whistle and let the higher-ups deal with it. They can decide if we need to investigate further or not.
upvoted 0 times
...
Roosevelt
26 days ago
Ah, the age-old dilemma of the auditor - when to sound the alarms and when to keep digging. I think I'd go with option B as well. Better to have a solid case before we bring in the big guns. Plus, who knows, maybe it's just an innocent mistake. 'Innocent mistake' - yeah, right, like that ever happens in payroll!
upvoted 0 times
...
Rebecka
27 days ago
Hmm, I can see the merit in both options B and C. But I think I might lean more towards option D - escalating the concern to the engagement supervisor. They might have a better handle on the appropriate next steps and can provide guidance on the best course of action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
28 days ago
I'm not so sure. If I suspect fraud, I'd want to get it in front of senior management as soon as possible. Option C might be the way to go - stop the audit and report it right away. No need to wait and let the fraud potentially continue.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sunny
1 months ago
I agree with Gracia. Option B seems like the best approach. We don't want to jump the gun, but we also can't ignore potential fraud. Keeping the investigation going while gathering more evidence is the responsible thing to do.
upvoted 0 times
...
Gracia
1 months ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. As an auditor, I need to balance the need for thorough investigation with the urgency of addressing potential fraud. I'm leaning towards option B - continuing the investigation to confirm the observations and determine the extent of any fraudulent payments. That way, I can provide a comprehensive report to management.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77