Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IFMA Exam CFM Topic 9 Question 4 Discussion

Actual exam question for IFMA's CFM exam
Question #: 4
Topic #: 9
[All CFM Questions]

The building automation systems (BAS) experienced a power loss. The systems are now back online and are accessible by remote monitoring controls. From a remote login, you observe that the indoor air temperatures are warmer than the settings. What should you do?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

When a Building Automation System (BAS) comes back online after a power loss, physical verification of HVAC equipment operation is essential to:

Confirm system restart success -- Some components may not fully reboot.

Check for mechanical failures -- Power loss could trigger equipment malfunctions.

Avoid incorrect system readings -- Remote monitoring may not reflect actual conditions.

Lowering temperature settings (Option A) is ineffective because it will not speed up cooling. Calling an onsite occupant (Option B) provides limited insight into the system's condition. While installing a generator (Option D) is a long-term solution, it does not address the immediate issue.


Contribute your Thoughts:

Emerson
2 months ago
This reminds me of the time the power went out at my grandma's nursing home and the backup generator kicked in - talk about a loud surprise!
upvoted 0 times
Kris
24 days ago
D) Recommend to the owner to install a generator to minimize the impact of future outages.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nguyet
1 months ago
C) Dispatch staff to physically check all equipment for proper operations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Earlean
2 months ago
B) Call an onsite occupant to verify the office space temperatures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Carmela
2 months ago
A) Lower the temperature set points to cool down the building faster.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Annita
2 months ago
D is an interesting long-term solution, but for this immediate situation, I think C is the best option to get things back on track.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willodean
3 months ago
A is definitely not the right call. Lowering the temperature set points could cause more issues if there's a problem with the equipment.
upvoted 0 times
...
Johana
3 months ago
Hmm, I'm torn between B and C. Verifying with an occupant first seems smart, but a hands-on inspection would give a more complete picture.
upvoted 0 times
...
Becky
3 months ago
B is the way to go. Verifying the temperatures with an onsite occupant is the quickest and most direct way to assess the situation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dominga
3 months ago
I'd go with C. Sending someone to physically check the equipment is the best way to ensure everything is working properly after the power loss.
upvoted 0 times
Carmen
2 months ago
C) Dispatch staff to physically check all equipment for proper operations.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lavera
2 months ago
B) Call an onsite occupant to verify the office space temperatures.
upvoted 0 times
...
Serina
2 months ago
A) Lower the temperature set points to cool down the building faster.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gracia
3 months ago
I think recommending to the owner to install a generator to minimize the impact of future outages is a proactive solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Celeste
3 months ago
I believe dispatching staff to physically check all equipment for proper operations is the best course of action.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sylvia
3 months ago
I disagree, calling an onsite occupant to verify the office space temperatures would be more effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lorrie
4 months ago
I think we should lower the temperature set points to cool down the building faster.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77