Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IBM Exam C9510-401 Topic 1 Question 84 Discussion

Actual exam question for IBM's C9510-401 exam
Question #: 84
Topic #: 1
[All C9510-401 Questions]

A web application was deployed on a WebSphere Application Server cluster. While users are using the application, one of the cluster servers fails and the users lose their working data.

What can the system administrator configure to ensure users can continue to work if one of the cluster server fails?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: D

WebSphere eXtreme Scale can dynamically process, partition, replicate, and manage application data and business logic across hundreds of servers. It provides transactional integrity and transparent fail-over to ensure high availability, high reliability, and consistent response times.

References: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/websphere/techjournal/1301_ying/1301_ying.html


Contribute your Thoughts:

Mammie
15 days ago
Hmm, I'm torn between options C and D. Both seem like viable solutions, but I think the WebSphere eXtreme Scale option might be the more robust and scalable choice in the long run.
upvoted 0 times
...
Yuki
17 days ago
A cluster of external HTTP servers (option B) sounds like it could work, but that seems like overkill for this scenario. Wouldn't a load balancer or the WebSphere session management be a more efficient solution?
upvoted 0 times
...
Della
18 days ago
I'm not convinced that an increased session timeout (option A) is the right answer here. That might just delay the inevitable, but it won't really solve the problem of losing user data when a server fails.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
19 days ago
Ah, yes, I remember learning about this in my WebSphere training. I think option C, a load balancer, is the way to go. It's a simple and effective solution to distribute the load across the cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Caitlin
21 days ago
Hmm, this is a tricky one. I'm leaning towards option D, WebSphere eXtreme Scale HTTP session management, as that seems like the most comprehensive solution to handle failover in a WebSphere cluster.
upvoted 0 times
...
Joseph
22 days ago
I'm not sure about this question. It seems to be testing our knowledge of WebSphere and session management, which isn't my strongest area. But I'll give it my best shot.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77