Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

IBM Exam C9510-401 Topic 8 Question 102 Discussion

Actual exam question for IBM's C9510-401 exam
Question #: 102
Topic #: 8
[All C9510-401 Questions]

A WebSphere Application Server cell was configured with a deployment manager node and a custom node. An operator manually changed some configuration files in the custom node, and the node became out of synch with the master repository.

The system administrator used the Synchronize button in the system administration session of the Integrated Solutions Console (ISC) to try to resynchronize the node, but the node remained out of sync.

What should the administrator do to fix it?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

In WebSphere Application Server Version 6.1, a trust association interceptor (TAI) that uses the Simple and Protected GSS-API Negotiation Mechanism (SPNEGO) to securely negotiate and authenticate HTTP requests for secured resources was introduced. This function was deprecated In WebSphere Application Server 7.0. SPNEGO web authentication has taken its place to provide dynamic reload of the SPNEGO filters and to enable fallback to the application login method.

References: https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSAW57_8.5.5/com.ibm.websphere.nd.doc/ae/csec_ssovo.html


by Jettie at Oct 22, 2024, 06:52 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C9510-401 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Caitlin
22 days ago
Hey, at least the operator didn't accidentally delete the entire node. That would have been a real head-scratcher!
upvoted 0 times
...
Horace
24 days ago
Manually copying the config files? That's a lot of work, and I'm pretty sure the Full Resynchronize button is designed to handle this exact scenario.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zachary
26 days ago
Recreating the custom profile? That's a bold move, but I'm not convinced it's the best solution here. Let's try the Full Resynchronize first.
upvoted 0 times
Louisa
8 days ago
I agree, trying the Full Resynchronize button seems like a safer option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Brendan
27 days ago
Invoking the 'sync' operation on the NodeSync MBean? Sounds like a fun experiment, but I'm not sure it'll fix the issue.
upvoted 0 times
Kandis
3 days ago
C: Maybe recreating the custom profile could also work without deleting the node.
upvoted 0 times
...
Quinn
5 days ago
B: Yeah, that could help get everything back in sync.
upvoted 0 times
...
Orville
6 days ago
A: I think using the Full Resynchronize button might be the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wenona
1 months ago
Ah, the age-old problem of manual configuration changes. Looks like the Full Resynchronize button is the way to go. That should put things back in sync.
upvoted 0 times
Willard
16 days ago
User 3: I've used that button before and it worked like a charm.
upvoted 0 times
...
Nichelle
17 days ago
User 2: Agreed, that should help get everything back in sync.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audra
27 days ago
User 1: I think using the Full Resynchronize button is the best option here.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Selene
2 months ago
Hmm, that's a good point. Maybe we should consider both options and see which one works.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mirta
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B) Invoke ''sync'' operation on NodeSync MBean would be more effective.
upvoted 0 times
...
Selene
2 months ago
I think option A) Use the Full Resynchronize button is the best choice.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77