Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IBM Exam C2090-623 Topic 7 Question 34 Discussion

Actual exam question for IBM's C2090-623 exam
Question #: 34
Topic #: 7
[All C2090-623 Questions]

An administrator wants to implement load balancing without using an external load balancing mechanism.

What is one approach that can be used to achieve this?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Administrators use the retention rule update task to specify the number of reports, queries, analyses, and document objects to keep in the content store. You can specify how long to keep the history and output versions in the content store. Anything that is older than the date you specify is deleted from the content store.

Run this task only after creating and running the content archival task. If you run it before, content that was not marked for archival is permanently deleted from the content store.

References: https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSEP7J_10.2.1/com.ibm.swg.ba.cognos.ug_cra.10.2.1.doc/t_creat_retent_rl.html


Contribute your Thoughts:

Melina
14 days ago
C) Configure dispatchers together with the content stores seems like the way to go. Keeps things centralized and manageable.
upvoted 0 times
Irene
1 days ago
A) Set up a standby Content Manager.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Wava
16 days ago
I'm not sure about that, I think option D) Configure gateways to direct all traffic to a dedicated dispatcher could also be a viable solution.
upvoted 0 times
...
Viola
24 days ago
I agree with Arlie, setting up dispatchers with content stores seems like a good approach for load balancing.
upvoted 0 times
...
Arlie
28 days ago
I think option C) Configure dispatchers together with the content stores could work.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77