Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IBM Exam C2090-623 Topic 3 Question 71 Discussion

Actual exam question for IBM's C2090-623 exam
Question #: 71
Topic #: 3
[All C2090-623 Questions]

An environment has two dispatchers with report servers installed on two machines with following configuration:

Dispatcher 1 on Computer A

Dispatcher 2 on Computer B

What should the setting of processing capacity for Dispatcher 2 be set to, if the capacity for Dispatcher 1 is set to 1?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: C

Administrators use the retention rule update task to specify the number of reports, queries, analyses, and document objects to keep in the content store. You can specify how long to keep the history and output versions in the content store. Anything that is older than the date you specify is deleted from the content store.

Run this task only after creating and running the content archival task. If you run it before, content that was not marked for archival is permanently deleted from the content store.

References: https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/en/SSEP7J_10.2.1/com.ibm.swg.ba.cognos.ug_cra.10.2.1.doc/t_creat_retent_rl.html


Contribute your Thoughts:

Leontine
28 days ago
B) 2 seems like the logical choice. You don't want to overload one dispatcher and leave the other underutilized. That's like trying to water a garden with a fire hose and a straw.
upvoted 0 times
...
Youlanda
1 months ago
I'm pretty sure the answer is A) 1. It's all about maintaining parity between the dispatchers, you know? Gotta keep things balanced, like a seesaw.
upvoted 0 times
Lili
8 days ago
Definitely, setting it to 1 for Dispatcher 2 makes sense to maintain parity.
upvoted 0 times
...
Rosendo
25 days ago
Yeah, you're right. It's important to keep the processing capacity balanced between the dispatchers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alonso
29 days ago
A) 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Selma
1 months ago
Wait, what if we set Dispatcher 2 to 8? Then we can have one dispatcher handle all the reports and the other can just take a nap. Efficiency at its finest!
upvoted 0 times
...
Cherilyn
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure. Maybe we should set Dispatcher 2 to 4 or 8 to take advantage of the extra processing power? After all, more is better, right?
upvoted 0 times
Gladis
29 days ago
I agree, setting it to 4 or 8 would definitely help balance the workload between the two dispatchers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Refugia
1 months ago
Setting Dispatcher 2 to 4 or 8 sounds like a good idea. More processing power can help with efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Annamaria
2 months ago
I'm going to go with B) 2. Seems like a reasonable setting to balance the load between the two dispatchers.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tegan
2 months ago
If Dispatcher 1 is set to 1, then Dispatcher 2 should be set to the same value, right? No point in having one dispatcher doing all the work while the other sits idle.
upvoted 0 times
Nida
10 days ago
No, it's better to set Dispatcher 2 to 1 to match the processing capacity of Dispatcher 1.
upvoted 0 times
...
In
11 days ago
B) 2
upvoted 0 times
...
Lilli
13 days ago
Yes, that's correct. Both dispatchers should have the same processing capacity to balance the workload.
upvoted 0 times
...
Octavio
14 days ago
A) 1
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Ashleigh
2 months ago
But if Dispatcher 1 is set to 1, then Dispatcher 2 should also be set to 1 to balance the load.
upvoted 0 times
...
Samira
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the setting for Dispatcher 2 should be 2.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ashleigh
2 months ago
I think the setting for Dispatcher 2 should be 1.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77