Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions
Mail Us support@pass4success.com
Location PL
Mob_nav_barsMENU

IBM Exam C1000-150 Topic 2 Question 38 Discussion

Actual exam question for IBM's C1000-150 exam
Question #: 38
Topic #: 2
[All C1000-150 Questions]

A new modification to the current Deployment has rendered it unstable. How can stability be regained?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

IBM Cloud Pak foundational services monitoring requires Role-based access control (RBAC) to monitor APIs and data. This ensures that only authorized users have access to the data and APIs that are being monitored. It also ensures that data is only being accessed by users with the appropriate permissions. Kibana is used as the data source for the Cloud Pak foundational services monitoring. Adopter customization is only necessary to query and visualize application metrics. Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform monitoring is not required for Cloud Pak foundational services monitoring.


by Loren at Aug 08, 2024, 10:09 AM

Limited Time Offer

25%

Off

Get Premium C1000-150 Questions as Interactive Web-Based Practice Test or PDF

Contribute your Thoughts:

Submit Cancel
Sue
22 days ago
Rollback to an earlier Deployment? That's the equivalent of hitting the reset button. Sometimes the old ways are the best, amirite?
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
1 months ago
Modifying the ReplicaSet? That's like rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic. Gotta go with the classic rollback, option D.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alba
1 months ago
Scaling the Deployment? That's like trying to put out a fire by adding more fuel. I'm going with D, the tried and true rollback approach.
upvoted 0 times
Shawna
5 days ago
But what if the issue persists even after the rollback?
upvoted 0 times
...
Tayna
6 days ago
Rollback to an earlier Deployment.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Emogene
2 months ago
Restarting the Deployment? That's a bold move, Cotton. I'd be a little worried about losing any unsaved changes. Gonna have to go with D on this one.
upvoted 0 times
Kimberlie
16 days ago
But what if the issue is with the ReplicaSet? Maybe modifying that could help.
upvoted 0 times
...
Mari
1 months ago
I agree, rolling back seems like the safest option.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Desire
2 months ago
Hmm, I think option D is the way to go. A rollback to an earlier Deployment version should restore stability. Gotta love that Kubernetes resilience!
upvoted 0 times
Temeka
29 days ago
I agree, let's go ahead and rollback to restore stability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Paulene
1 months ago
Option D sounds like the best solution. Let's rollback to the earlier Deployment version.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Mozelle
2 months ago
I think we should rollback to an earlier Deployment to ensure stability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Elza
2 months ago
I agree with Brunilda, scaling the Deployment seems like the best option.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brunilda
2 months ago
I think we should scale the Deployment to regain stability.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77