Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IBM Exam C1000-140 Topic 8 Question 20 Discussion

Actual exam question for IBM's C1000-140 exam
Question #: 20
Topic #: 8
[All C1000-140 Questions]

A QRadar deployment uses multiple domains to provide data separation between different departments in the organization.

When the tenants and users are configured, which constraints are enforced?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Lizbeth
1 months ago
Wait, so I can't have multiple domains in a single tenant? That's just crazy talk! This exam is really going to test my QRadar knowledge.
upvoted 0 times
Thora
4 days ago
C: That's correct, each domain can only be in a single tenant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Dexter
10 days ago
B: No, a tenant can only have one domain.
upvoted 0 times
...
Barney
11 days ago
A: A tenant can contain multiple domains; each domain may be in multiple tenants.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Margot
1 months ago
Option C definitely looks like the winner here. I'm glad I didn't get too bogged down in the details and just focused on the key points.
upvoted 0 times
Stephen
11 days ago
It's important to keep things organized and secure with the right constraints in place.
upvoted 0 times
...
Lezlie
12 days ago
Yeah, having multiple domains in a single tenant seems like the best way to go.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alline
19 days ago
I agree, option C makes the most sense for data separation.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Lenna
1 months ago
Haha, I bet the exam designers were really trying to trip us up with this one. Good thing I read the question carefully and went with Option C.
upvoted 0 times
Alana
2 days ago
I almost picked Option A, but then I double-checked and went with Option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
Hillary
6 days ago
I got confused at first, but then I realized that Option C was the correct one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Cora
18 days ago
I agree, the wording of the options can be tricky. I also chose Option C.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jackie
2 months ago
I was a bit confused at first, but now I think Option C makes the most sense. The constraints around tenants and domains seem pretty straightforward.
upvoted 0 times
Margurite
18 days ago
I think so too. Having multiple domains in a single tenant could cause confusion and security risks.
upvoted 0 times
...
Valene
1 months ago
I agree, Option C does seem to make the most sense. It's important to keep the domains separated by tenants.
upvoted 0 times
...
Annamae
1 months ago
Yes, having multiple domains within a tenant but each domain only in a single tenant ensures proper organization and security.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alysa
1 months ago
I agree, Option C does seem to make the most sense. It's important to have that data separation between departments.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Merilyn
2 months ago
That makes sense too, having multiple users in a tenant can help with managing access permissions.
upvoted 0 times
...
Willow
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is D. Each tenant can have multiple users for access control.
upvoted 0 times
...
Merilyn
2 months ago
I think the answer is C, because each domain should only be in a single tenant for data separation.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
2 months ago
That's an interesting point, Renay. I can see how that could also be a valid answer. It's important to consider all possibilities.
upvoted 0 times
...
Eva
2 months ago
Option C seems like the correct choice. The question mentions that the deployment uses multiple domains to provide data separation, which suggests that each domain can only be associated with a single tenant.
upvoted 0 times
...
Renay
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe the answer is A. A tenant can contain multiple domains and each domain may be in multiple tenants.
upvoted 0 times
...
Wilda
2 months ago
I think the answer is C, because a tenant can have multiple domains but each domain can only be in one tenant.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77