Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IBM Exam C1000-132 Topic 2 Question 28 Discussion

Actual exam question for IBM's C1000-132 exam
Question #: 28
Topic #: 2
[All C1000-132 Questions]

Which statement is true regarding Master Preventative Maintenance (PM) records?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: B

Contribute your Thoughts:

Mammie
5 days ago
C can't be right, 90 days seems way too short for PM records. Those should stick around for at least a year, if not longer. Maybe they're trying to trick us with that one.
upvoted 0 times
...
Shad
8 days ago
Hmm, I was going to say D, but now I'm second-guessing myself. I thought the associated records could only be tied to the asset location, not the asset itself. This is a tricky one!
upvoted 0 times
...
Eden
11 days ago
I'm pretty sure it's B. The question says 'Master Preventative Maintenance (PM) records', so the associated PM records should be able to be created for the Master PM itself, even if it doesn't have a specific asset attached to it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laquita
16 days ago
Hmm, that's interesting. Can you explain why you think that is the correct answer?
upvoted 0 times
...
Jeffrey
21 days ago
I disagree, I believe the correct answer is A) Associated PM records can only be created for a rotating item's asset.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laquita
22 days ago
I think the answer is B) Associated PM records can be created for a Master PM which does not have an item.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77