C can't be right, 90 days seems way too short for PM records. Those should stick around for at least a year, if not longer. Maybe they're trying to trick us with that one.
Hmm, I was going to say D, but now I'm second-guessing myself. I thought the associated records could only be tied to the asset location, not the asset itself. This is a tricky one!
I'm pretty sure it's B. The question says 'Master Preventative Maintenance (PM) records', so the associated PM records should be able to be created for the Master PM itself, even if it doesn't have a specific asset attached to it.
Mammie
5 days agoShad
8 days agoEden
11 days agoLaquita
16 days agoJeffrey
21 days agoLaquita
22 days ago