Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IBM Exam C1000-116 Topic 7 Question 14 Discussion

Actual exam question for IBM's C1000-116 exam
Question #: 14
Topic #: 7
[All C1000-116 Questions]

A developer has worked with end-users in a requirements session to establish what can be selected on the Single Select control in CoachView1 seen below. To ensure that the selections are easily maintainable, the developer wants to dynamically lookup the selections at runtime. What two options does the developer have available to achieve this requirement? (Choose two.)

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Sabrina
25 days ago
I bet the developer is wishing they had a crystal ball to see all the possible selection options. Maybe they should invest in a Magic 8-Ball while they're at it.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reita
26 days ago
I'm going to go with options C and E. Gotta love that dynamic lookup, and the Ajax service approach sounds like it could be a real time-saver down the line. Cha-ching!
upvoted 0 times
Jenelle
2 days ago
E) Update the Item lookup mode to Items From Service and select a service flow that follows the Ajax service specification as the List items service.
upvoted 0 times
...
Adelle
9 days ago
C) Pass a business object via the CoachView1 Configuration Options, update the Item lookup mode to Items From Service and select the business object as Service input data for the Default List Items Service.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Bulah
1 months ago
Option E is intriguing, but I wonder if it's overkill to set up a whole Ajax service just for this. Might be worth exploring the other options first.
upvoted 0 times
...
Sanjuana
1 months ago
Option D looks interesting, but I'm not sure if selecting the business object as Item selection data is the same as using it as the Binding. I'd double-check the documentation on that one.
upvoted 0 times
Christa
30 days ago
Yeah, option D might be a bit confusing with the Item selection data. It's always best to double-check the documentation to be sure.
upvoted 0 times
...
Kanisha
1 months ago
I agree, option A seems like a solid choice for dynamically looking up the selections at runtime.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thea
1 months ago
I think option A is the way to go, passing a business object via the CoachView1 Configuration Options seems like a good approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Whitley
2 months ago
I'm leaning towards option C. Passing a business object and setting the Item lookup mode to Items From Service seems like the most straightforward approach.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernie
2 months ago
Hmm, I see your point. Let's discuss the pros and cons of each option further.
upvoted 0 times
...
Jacquelyne
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe options B and E are more suitable for this requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ernie
2 months ago
I think options A and C are the best choices.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reta
2 months ago
But option A allows for easily maintainable selections by updating the Item lookup mode and selecting the business object as the Binding.
upvoted 0 times
...
Glory
2 months ago
Hmm, options C and E seem like the best choices here. Dynamically looking up the selections at runtime is a great way to ensure maintainability.
upvoted 0 times
Geraldine
21 days ago
Great point! It's important to consider maintainability when setting up the Single Select control in CoachView1.
upvoted 0 times
...
Stanton
1 months ago
By combining options C and E, the developer can achieve the requirement of dynamically looking up selections at runtime.
upvoted 0 times
...
Afton
2 months ago
I agree, option E is also a good choice because it involves selecting a service flow for List items service.
upvoted 0 times
...
Twanna
2 months ago
Option C allows us to update the Item lookup mode to Items From Service, which is essential for dynamic lookup.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gearldine
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option B and option E are more suitable for this requirement.
upvoted 0 times
...
Reta
2 months ago
I think option A and option C are the best choices.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77