Deal of The Day! Hurry Up, Grab the Special Discount - Save 25% - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IBM Exam C1000-101 Topic 6 Question 36 Discussion

Actual exam question for IBM's C1000-101 exam
Question #: 36
Topic #: 6
[All C1000-101 Questions]

A company has a high-performance application which runs on a custom developed operating system. The system requires additional resources based on an unexpected increase in workload. They have decided to replatform the application and to provide additional capacity before their customers are impacted. Which IBM Cloud solution should they use?

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Denae
26 days ago
Bare Metal Server? More like Bare Metal Superstar! That's the way to go, my friends.
upvoted 0 times
Edmond
2 days ago
Bare Metal Server
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Hildred
28 days ago
I'd go with the Bare Metal Server. It's the closest thing to their current setup, and they'll have complete control over the hardware.
upvoted 0 times
...
Delsie
1 months ago
The Hyper Protect Virtual Server sounds interesting, but I'm not sure if it's the right fit for this use case. It might be overkill for their needs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Beatriz
1 months ago
The Virtual Server Instances could be a good option, but I'm worried it might not be able to handle the high-performance requirements of the application.
upvoted 0 times
Ena
3 days ago
B: I agree, Bare Metal Server provides the power and performance needed for demanding workloads.
upvoted 0 times
...
Youlanda
13 days ago
A: I think Bare Metal Server would be the best choice for high-performance applications.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Loreta
2 months ago
I'm not sure about the LinuxONE Server option. It might not have the same level of customization and control that the custom operating system needs.
upvoted 0 times
Joaquin
3 days ago
C: Virtual Server Instances could also be a good choice to quickly scale up resources for the application.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leatha
9 days ago
B: I agree, Bare Metal Server would provide the customization and control needed for the custom operating system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Junita
23 days ago
A: I think Bare Metal Server might be the best option for the high-performance application.
upvoted 0 times
...
Isaac
29 days ago
C: Hyper Protect Virtual Server might be the best choice for security and protection of our custom operating system.
upvoted 0 times
...
Loise
1 months ago
B: Virtual Server Instances could also be a good option for scalability and flexibility.
upvoted 0 times
...
Laquanda
1 months ago
A: I think we should go with Bare Metal Server for more control and customization.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Candra
2 months ago
I think LinuxONE Server could also be a good option for replatforming the application.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vi
2 months ago
I think the Bare Metal Server option would be the best choice here. It provides the high-performance hardware that the custom operating system requires.
upvoted 0 times
Blondell
26 days ago
Yes, Bare Metal Server provides the necessary resources for custom operating systems.
upvoted 0 times
...
Blondell
1 months ago
I agree, Bare Metal Server would be the best choice for high-performance applications.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Jolanda
2 months ago
I agree with Alecia, Bare Metal Server would provide the additional capacity needed.
upvoted 0 times
...
Alecia
2 months ago
I think they should use Bare Metal Server for high performance.
upvoted 0 times
...
Leontine
2 months ago
I see both points, but I think option D) Hyper Protect Virtual Server would provide the security and capacity we need.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ellsworth
2 months ago
I disagree, I believe option C) Virtual Server Instances would be a better choice for scalability.
upvoted 0 times
...
Vallie
2 months ago
I think we should go with option A) Bare Metal Server.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77