Independence Day Deal! Unlock 25% OFF Today – Limited-Time Offer - Ends In 00:00:00 Coupon code: SAVE25
Welcome to Pass4Success

- Free Preparation Discussions

IASSC Exam ICYB Topic 1 Question 67 Discussion

Actual exam question for IASSC's ICYB exam
Question #: 67
Topic #: 1
[All ICYB Questions]

A Belt has determined that the insurance claim form needn't be reviewed by accounting thereby improving the number of claims a processer can handle. According to Cost of Poor Quality (COPQ) definitions RTY improvement would be considered _______________.

Show Suggested Answer Hide Answer
Suggested Answer: A

Contribute your Thoughts:

Lisbeth
1 months ago
I'm going to have to disagree with my fellow candidates. This is clearly a case of A) Downsizing savings. By eliminating the accounting review, they're essentially downsizing that department. Boom, mic drop.
upvoted 0 times
Loreta
5 days ago
I agree with the initial assessment of A) Downsizing savings. Removing the need for accounting review is definitely a form of downsizing in terms of resources and time.
upvoted 0 times
...
Brandon
6 days ago
I see your point, but I still believe it falls under D) Hard savings. Any direct cost reduction or efficiency improvement would be classified as hard savings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Graciela
11 days ago
I think it's actually C) Soft savings. By streamlining the process, they are saving time and resources which can be considered soft savings.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Armando
1 months ago
I'm going to have to go with C) Soft savings. Anything that's not a direct reduction in labor or materials is usually considered a soft saving. Although, I guess you could argue it's a hard saving since it's reducing the workload. I'm just going to go with my gut on this one.
upvoted 0 times
Cecilia
19 days ago
I think C) Soft savings makes sense in this case.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Gennie
1 months ago
As an accountant, I'd have to go with D) Hard savings. Anything that improves the efficiency of a process and reduces costs should be considered a hard saving, not just a fluffy 'soft' one.
upvoted 0 times
Raina
1 days ago
Definitely, C) Soft savings just doesn't have the same impact as hard savings when it comes to improving processes.
upvoted 0 times
...
Ben
6 days ago
I agree, D) Hard savings is the way to go. It's all about reducing costs and improving efficiency.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Blair
2 months ago
Hmm, I'm not so sure. Couldn't this also be considered D) Hard savings since it's reducing the overall cost of processing claims? I'll have to think this one through a bit more.
upvoted 0 times
Rodney
1 months ago
Let's look into it further to make sure we understand the concept correctly.
upvoted 0 times
...
Amber
1 months ago
Maybe it's a combination of both Hard savings and Soft savings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Tamera
1 months ago
I agree, it seems like it would fall under the category of Hard savings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Refugia
1 months ago
I see your point, but I still think D) Hard savings makes more sense.
upvoted 0 times
...
Audra
1 months ago
I think it could be D) Hard savings because it's reducing costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
Zena
1 months ago
But wouldn't it also be C) Soft savings since it's improving efficiency?
upvoted 0 times
...
Ronnie
1 months ago
I think it could be D) Hard savings because it's reducing costs.
upvoted 0 times
...
...
Valda
2 months ago
I think the answer is C) Soft savings. Streamlining the insurance claim review process sounds like a process improvement that would reduce costs without directly adding to the bottom line.
upvoted 0 times
...
Thora
2 months ago
But wouldn't it also result in soft savings since it improves efficiency?
upvoted 0 times
...
Lucina
2 months ago
I agree with Minna, improving RTY would lead to hard savings.
upvoted 0 times
...
Minna
3 months ago
I think the answer is D) Hard savings.
upvoted 0 times
...

Save Cancel
az-700  pass4success  az-104  200-301  200-201  cissp  350-401  350-201  350-501  350-601  350-801  350-901  az-720  az-305  pl-300  

Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /pass.php:70) in /pass.php on line 77